We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In the current Core Person Vocabulary:
https://semiceu.github.io/Core-Person-Vocabulary/releases/2.00/#Person
The Person class has 2 properties: "family name" and "given name".
The "family name" property has URI: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/familyName The "given name" property has URI: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/givenName
The 2 URI give now a "not found" error. The 2 URI have been created following FOAF 0.99 of 2014, now reachable via Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20220518003509/http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20140114.html
However currently/temporarily FOAF switched to version 0.1 of 2004 where the 2 URI are respectively:
This issue is open to take the time to evaluate if the temporary switch will persist or not.
It can be noticed that in LOV both URI are present, thus is expected that the community is also splitted between the 2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In the current Core Person Vocabulary:
https://semiceu.github.io/Core-Person-Vocabulary/releases/2.00/#Person
The Person class has 2 properties: "family name" and "given name".
The "family name" property has URI: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/familyName
The "given name" property has URI: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/givenName
The 2 URI give now a "not found" error.
The 2 URI have been created following FOAF 0.99 of 2014, now reachable via Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20220518003509/http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20140114.html
However currently/temporarily FOAF switched to version 0.1 of 2004 where the 2 URI are respectively:
This issue is open to take the time to evaluate if the temporary switch will persist or not.
It can be noticed that in LOV both URI are present, thus is expected that the community is also splitted between the 2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: