Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
i always like to see more X to RDF tools! though i don't often have a need for metadata -- instead i almost always need the actual content. for example here is something i still find to be useful. what uses have you found this to help with? got any examples? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
A little introduction: Semantic File Inspector is another "anything-to-RDF" tool whose goal is to collect metadata from files and file systems (archives, directories, etc.) using domain-specific vocabularies. You are welcome to try it out (runs completely in the browser) here.
While SFI is focusing more on metadata and external description (for example, for images: dimensions, color depth, EXIF, etc.), as well as identification (making it useful for archival, semantic search, and similar areas), rather than transforming any data fully into RDF, I believe alignment and potential incorporation of the two approaches would be beneficial (SFI runs on .NET, so full interoperability requires IKVM or similar). I have already started incorporating deeper format structure into the output, such as with describing .NET classes, fields, methods, etc. using CodeOntology, and I plan to do the same with XML using the XML Infoset vocabulary. As long as sufficient vocabularies are available, anything is open for addition, and suggestions or contributions are always welcome.
In SFI, the actual content is described at various levels; for data like XML, there could even be 4 in total:
For an example of possible interoperation, for the last level (i.e.
ni:///mh;4ucCCNdNlXzirfpf?ct=application/prs.implied-document+xml;root=elem
), I plan to use thexyz:
namespace or similar to "interpret" the XML document directly using the elements, attributes etc. inside, rather than describing the XML content/infoset as in the previous level.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions