You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems confusing to have two meanings of the term 'method' - SPORE methods and HTTP methods. For example, a SPORE specification has a 'methods' object, each of whose members is a SPORE method, and each of these SPORE methods has an HTTP method attribute named 'method'. Phew.
Since a SPORE method has a URL and an HTTP method, I would find it more natural to call it an 'API operation', or maybe 'operation' for short.
I realise you can't break backward compatibility, but perhaps you could consider permitting some alias for SPORE methods that doesn't include the word 'method'?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems confusing to have two meanings of the term 'method' - SPORE methods and HTTP methods. For example, a SPORE specification has a 'methods' object, each of whose members is a SPORE method, and each of these SPORE methods has an HTTP method attribute named 'method'. Phew.
Since a SPORE method has a URL and an HTTP method, I would find it more natural to call it an 'API operation', or maybe 'operation' for short.
I realise you can't break backward compatibility, but perhaps you could consider permitting some alias for SPORE methods that doesn't include the word 'method'?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: