From 16a9aa0902fd136038d4fe106e192fce02ff49b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahek0620 <136893675+mahek0620@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:55:01 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Create contributors.php
---
contributors.php | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 187 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 contributors.php
diff --git a/contributors.php b/contributors.php
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8886c77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contributors.php
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+ Contributors
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
From 1e211f89010f6933239281e2c3b729406c1a03f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahek0620 <136893675+mahek0620@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:23:02 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Update Readme.md
added profile photo of contributors in readme
---
Readme.md | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md
index ec564b6..a924396 100644
--- a/Readme.md
+++ b/Readme.md
@@ -148,3 +148,14 @@ Congratulations🎉, you have made a pull request to the Faculty Evaluation Syst
## 💻How to run on your local system
+
+
+Contributors
+ "Saiyam Tuteja", + "username" => "SaiyamTuteja", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/SaiyamTuteja", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/57866007?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Aindree Chatterjee", + "username" => "aindree-2005", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/aindree-2005", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/86460166?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Akarshraj M", + "username" => "akarshraj96", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/akarshraj96", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/112420786?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Aniket Chakraborty", + "username" => "Aniket-coder-711", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/Aniket-coder-711", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/129522869?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Harshit Gupta", + "username" => "Harshit140", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/Harshit140", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/114706608?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Khushi Tyagi", + "username" => "khushi463-tyagi", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/khushi463-tyagi", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/110461785?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Mahek", + "username" => "mahek0620", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/mahek0620", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/90625485?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Prajwal D P", + "username" => "prajwaldp223", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/prajwaldp223", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123730048?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Rahul", + "username" => "RahulK4102", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/RahulK4102", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/84072685?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Sanmarg Sandeep Paranjpe", + "username" => "sanmarg", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/sanmarg", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/97022030?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Shivam Kumar", + "username" => "sk-upadhyay", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/sk-upadhyay", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/60136744?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Siddheya Kulkarni", + "username" => "Asymtode712", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/Asymtode712", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/103847145?v=4" + ], + [ + "name" => "Suhani Singh Paliwal", + "username" => "suhanipaliwal", + "profile_url" => "https://github.com/suhanipaliwal", + "avatar_url" => "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/81972124?v=4" + ] + ]; + + foreach ($contributors as $contributor) { + echo '';
+ echo '
';
+ echo '
';
+ }
+ ?>
+ ';
+ echo '
';
+ echo '' . $contributor["name"] . '
'; + echo 'Username: ' . $contributor["username"] . '
'; + echo '
+
+ Thank You, Contributors!
+We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all the contributors who have helped make this project a success. Your time, effort, and expertise are deeply appreciated. Together, we are building something amazing!
+
+
+ Want to Contribute?
+We welcome contributions from everyone. If you would like to contribute to this project, please visit our GitHub repository.
+Please read our contribution guidelines before you start.
+Here are some ways you can contribute:
+-
+
- Report bugs and suggest features via the issue tracker. +
- Submit pull requests to fix bugs or add new features. +
- Improve documentation and help others understand the project better. +
Our Contributors ❤️
+
+
From 11f33d93aca728256295ce599ff7ba91cc36091d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahek0620 <136893675+mahek0620@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:38:32 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Update Readme.md
added profile photo of contributors in readme
---
Readme.md | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md
index a924396..9efc65a 100644
--- a/Readme.md
+++ b/Readme.md
@@ -152,9 +152,16 @@ Congratulations🎉, you have made a pull request to the Faculty Evaluation Syst
Thank you for contributing to our repository.😃
+ +) + +### Show some ❤️ by starring this awesome repository! + +Our Contributors ❤️
-
+
+ 
+
### Show some ❤️ by starring this awesome repository!
From 83437bb8155abcbab8d5e944496b664e1eb0a410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahek0620 <136893675+mahek0620@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:06:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Changed Faculty Evaluation System to ProfPraisal
---
LEARN.md | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
Readme.md | 12 ++++++------
database/evaluation_db.sql | 2 +-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/LEARN.md b/LEARN.md
index 346fbd9..1a2b8a2 100644
--- a/LEARN.md
+++ b/LEARN.md
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
Introduction
- The Faculty Evaluation System
+ The ProfPraisal
System Requirements
- Developing the Faculty Evaluation System
+ Developing the ProfPraisal
Integration and Testing
@@ -28,33 +28,33 @@
# Introduction:
-The faculty evaluation system was developed as an automated aid for evaluating faculty. The system allows the evaluations to be processed at a central location by data entry personnel. The system was set up and documented to allow unexperienced data entry personnel to use the system. The user's manual and the system manual are described in appendix A and appendix B respectively.
+The ProfPraisal was developed as an automated aid for evaluating faculty. The system allows the evaluations to be processed at a central location by data entry personnel. The system was set up and documented to allow unexperienced data entry personnel to use the system. The user's manual and the system manual are described in appendix A and appendix B respectively.
-The faculty evaluation system is composed of three parts. The first part reads in the information on the instructors that is needed to produce questionnaire forms.
+The ProfPraisal is composed of three parts. The first part reads in the information on the instructors that is needed to produce questionnaire forms.
The first part of the system produces the questionnaire forms on Scantron readable cards. The second part of the system uses a Scantron card reader to read in the answers to the questions and generate statistics about them. A report for the instructor and the faculty evaluation committee is then produced showing the results of the questionnaires.
The instructor receives a report on both the general questions and on the questions that he picked from the data base. The faculty evaluation committee receives a report with only the results to the general questions. The third part of the system is a maintenance program for the question data base and the standard questionnaire form data base.
-# The Faculty Evaluation System:
+# The ProfPraisal:
)
-The faculty evaluation system is being used by the university because a collective bargaining agreement between the University of Montana Teacher's Union and the Board of Regents requires that there be some method of evaluating faculty. Each faculty member is rated as to how well he performs in the following categories:
+The ProfPraisal is being used by the university because a collective bargaining agreement between the University of Montana Teacher's Union and the Board of Regents requires that there be some method of evaluating faculty. Each faculty member is rated as to how well he performs in the following categories:
a) Research
b) Public Service
c) Teaching - The faculty evaluation will measure this.
-The faculty evaluation system creates a questionnaire with 10 general questions and up to 23 private questions. The 10 general questions consists of seven demographics questions about the students taking the course. The other three general questions are used for evaluating the instructor. The 23 private questions are chosen by the instructor from a data base of questions.
+The ProfPraisal creates a questionnaire with 10 general questions and up to 23 private questions. The 10 general questions consists of seven demographics questions about the students taking the course. The other three general questions are used for evaluating the instructor. The 23 private questions are chosen by the instructor from a data base of questions.
-The faculty evaluation system will aid the faculty evaluation committee by providing standard reports. The committee will use the global questions to make general personnel decisions/ deciding, for example, if a faculty member should be promoted. The global questions will also provide information on what the students think about the course.
+The ProfPraisal will aid the faculty evaluation committee by providing standard reports. The committee will use the global questions to make general personnel decisions/ deciding, for example, if a faculty member should be promoted. The global questions will also provide information on what the students think about the course.
-The faculty evaluation system is composed of three basic parts: production of instructor questionnaire forms, generation of the reports on the answers to the forms, and maintenance of a data base of evaluation questions and standard questionnaire forms.
+The ProfPraisal is composed of three basic parts: production of instructor questionnaire forms, generation of the reports on the answers to the forms, and maintenance of a data base of evaluation questions and standard questionnaire forms.
# System Requirements:
1. Question Requests:
-Each instructor that is using the faculty evaluation system will have the first ten questions of the evaluation questionnaire generated automatically. These questions consist of two types of questions. The first seven questions pertain to demographic questions about the students. The next three questions are to obtain general information about the instructor.
+Each instructor that is using the ProfPraisal will have the first ten questions of the evaluation questionnaire generated automatically. These questions consist of two types of questions. The first seven questions pertain to demographic questions about the students. The next three questions are to obtain general information about the instructor.
2. Questionnaire Generation:
The information about each instructor and the questions that he is using will be used to print out the instructors requested number of forms. The questionnaire forms will be printed on a special form that can also be fed through a Scantron card reader. The ten questions referenced above will be preprinted on these forms. The questionnaires will then be distributed to the instructor's to be passed out to
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The questionnaire answers will be entered into the computer by the Scantron card
There will be a automated method for updating the list of questions and the standard forms. There will also be a method used to print out the list of questions and the standard forms.
-# Developing the Faculty Evaluation System:
+# Developing the ProfPraisal:
There were some problems in creating the models using PSL/PSA, since nobody had any knowledge about how to use the automated design aid. This problem was overcome by doing a lot of reading and trial and error. Technologies used are:
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ There were some problems in creating the models using PSL/PSA, since nobody had # Integration and Testing: -The faculty evaluation system was tested under actual operating conditions. The routines were set up and checked to see if they were free of most of the errors. The data entry personnel were then allowed to use the programs. There were relatively few errors found by the data entry personnel. +The ProfPraisal was tested under actual operating conditions. The routines were set up and checked to see if they were free of most of the errors. The data entry personnel were then allowed to use the programs. There were relatively few errors found by the data entry personnel. The routines were set up in three basic groups: the questionnaire generation routines, the report generation routines and the questionnaire maintenance routines. @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ The report generation routines were the first set of programs written. The initi # Summary and Conclusion: -The faculty evaluation system was designed and implemented to aid in the evaluation of faculty. The system was set up so that the evaluations could be tabulated in a single area instead of having each department form a student +The ProfPraisal was designed and implemented to aid in the evaluation of faculty. The system was set up so that the evaluations could be tabulated in a single area instead of having each department form a student committee to tabulate the results. The system was also set up so that instructors could choose a wide variety of questions and improve their teaching by the feedback. The system was implemented after extensive modeling of the old system was done. The system was then redesigned and implemented after a quarter of testing. The current system is set up so that it can be easily changed as new ideas are diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md index 1e9f806..aea7b55 100644 --- a/Readme.md +++ b/Readme.md @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ -# 👩🏫Faculty Evaluation System +# 👩🏫ProfPraisal -## 👇About Faculty Evaluation System -The Faculty Evaluation System is a PHP/MySQL project that helps an individual school manage its evaluation results. The system has three user types which are the Administrator, Faculties, and the Students. +## 👇About ProfPraisal +The ProfPraisal is a PHP/MySQL project that helps an individual school manage its evaluation results. The system has three user types which are the Administrator, Faculties, and the Students.
The Administrator user is in-charge of maintaining and populate the data in the system database using the front-end feature for the admin sides, such as the list of subjects, faculties, students, and some other related data. The student users are permitted only to evaluate the faculties assigned to their class per issue.The faculties users are only allowed to view their evaluation result even the evaluation is still ongoing. ## 🌟 Why Use This System -1. **Efficient Evaluation Management:** The Faculty Evaluation System streamlines the evaluation process, ensuring that all evaluations are systematically organized and managed. +1. **Efficient Evaluation Management:** The ProfPraisal streamlines the evaluation process, ensuring that all evaluations are systematically organized and managed. 2. **User-friendly Interface:** The system provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface for all user types, enhancing user experience and reducing the learning curve. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ The Administrator user is in-charge of maintaining and populate the data in the ## 🤝How to Contribute -If you think that you can add a new feature or want to fix a bug, we invite you to contribute to **Faculty Evaluation System +If you think that you can add a new feature or want to fix a bug, we invite you to contribute to **ProfPraisal ** and make this project better.
To start contributing, follow the below instructions: @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ git push -u origin
18. Click on `Create pull request`.
-Congratulations🎉, you have made a pull request to the Faculty Evaluation System. Wait for your submission to be accepted and merged.
+Congratulations🎉, you have made a pull request to the ProfPraisal. Wait for your submission to be accepted and merged.
## 💻How to run on your local system and setup database
diff --git a/database/evaluation_db.sql b/database/evaluation_db.sql
index d024365..8d8f70d 100644
--- a/database/evaluation_db.sql
+++ b/database/evaluation_db.sql
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ CREATE TABLE `system_settings` (
--
INSERT INTO `system_settings` (`id`, `name`, `email`, `contact`, `address`, `cover_img`) VALUES
-(1, 'Faculty Evaluation System', 'info@sample.comm', '+6948 8542 623', '2102 Caldwell Road, Rochester, New York, 14608', '');
+(1, 'ProfPraisal', 'info@sample.comm', '+6948 8542 623', '2102 Caldwell Road, Rochester, New York, 14608', '');
-- --------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for contributing to our repository.😃
- -) +
+
+
+
+Thank you for contributing to our project! We appreciate your help in Faculty_Evaluation_System even better.😃
+
+
Contributors
+@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ There were some problems in creating the models using PSL/PSA, since nobody had # Integration and Testing: -The faculty evaluation system was tested under actual operating conditions. The routines were set up and checked to see if they were free of most of the errors. The data entry personnel were then allowed to use the programs. There were relatively few errors found by the data entry personnel. +The ProfPraisal was tested under actual operating conditions. The routines were set up and checked to see if they were free of most of the errors. The data entry personnel were then allowed to use the programs. There were relatively few errors found by the data entry personnel. The routines were set up in three basic groups: the questionnaire generation routines, the report generation routines and the questionnaire maintenance routines. @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ The report generation routines were the first set of programs written. The initi # Summary and Conclusion: -The faculty evaluation system was designed and implemented to aid in the evaluation of faculty. The system was set up so that the evaluations could be tabulated in a single area instead of having each department form a student +The ProfPraisal was designed and implemented to aid in the evaluation of faculty. The system was set up so that the evaluations could be tabulated in a single area instead of having each department form a student committee to tabulate the results. The system was also set up so that instructors could choose a wide variety of questions and improve their teaching by the feedback. The system was implemented after extensive modeling of the old system was done. The system was then redesigned and implemented after a quarter of testing. The current system is set up so that it can be easily changed as new ideas are diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md index 1e9f806..aea7b55 100644 --- a/Readme.md +++ b/Readme.md @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ -# 👩🏫Faculty Evaluation System +# 👩🏫ProfPraisal -## 👇About Faculty Evaluation System -The Faculty Evaluation System is a PHP/MySQL project that helps an individual school manage its evaluation results. The system has three user types which are the Administrator, Faculties, and the Students. +## 👇About ProfPraisal +The ProfPraisal is a PHP/MySQL project that helps an individual school manage its evaluation results. The system has three user types which are the Administrator, Faculties, and the Students.
The Administrator user is in-charge of maintaining and populate the data in the system database using the front-end feature for the admin sides, such as the list of subjects, faculties, students, and some other related data. The student users are permitted only to evaluate the faculties assigned to their class per issue.The faculties users are only allowed to view their evaluation result even the evaluation is still ongoing. ## 🌟 Why Use This System -1. **Efficient Evaluation Management:** The Faculty Evaluation System streamlines the evaluation process, ensuring that all evaluations are systematically organized and managed. +1. **Efficient Evaluation Management:** The ProfPraisal streamlines the evaluation process, ensuring that all evaluations are systematically organized and managed. 2. **User-friendly Interface:** The system provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface for all user types, enhancing user experience and reducing the learning curve. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ The Administrator user is in-charge of maintaining and populate the data in the ## 🤝How to Contribute -If you think that you can add a new feature or want to fix a bug, we invite you to contribute to **Faculty Evaluation System +If you think that you can add a new feature or want to fix a bug, we invite you to contribute to **ProfPraisal ** and make this project better.
To start contributing, follow the below instructions: @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ git push -u origin