Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some type definitions are pointing to a See Type Github link #10

Open
garyghayrat opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@garyghayrat
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@marcomariscal
Copy link
Contributor

Sometimes the type is too verbose to show within the docs page, so we let them navigate to the actual type definition in the repo (if they want).

Let me know if ok or if you were thinking of something else.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants