You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
I'm wondering if we want to follow the api's snake_case conventions considering this is a JS library or if we want to further abstract it and handle converting the properties ourselves (user types camelCased properties and we convert it to snake_case). Just a thought though because using the raw API does make this a lot simpler.
JS libraries generally use camelCase instead of snake_case but i perhaps we could modify REST to convert camelCase types automatically to snake_cased one
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Without abstraction it looks like this
I'm wondering if we want to follow the api's snake_case conventions considering this is a JS library or if we want to further abstract it and handle converting the properties ourselves (user types camelCased properties and we convert it to snake_case). Just a thought though because using the raw API does make this a lot simpler.
Originally posted by @Nciklol in #18 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: