Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use existing TS file as base oscillation #9

Open
SebastianSchmidl opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Use existing TS file as base oscillation #9

SebastianSchmidl opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request 🏅 very low MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)

Comments

@SebastianSchmidl
Copy link
Member

Use an existing time series as base oscillation for a new dataset. This allows injecting our anomalies into existing time series. The file must be formatted in our canonical file format.

GutenTAG tries to parse the ground truth (label) information to prevent anomaly overlaps.

Example configuration:

timeseries:
  - name: "test"
    base-oscillations:
      - kind: file
        path: path/to/file.csv
        channel: 0
@SebastianSchmidl SebastianSchmidl added enhancement New feature or request 🏅 very low MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have) labels Feb 7, 2023
@SebastianSchmidl
Copy link
Member Author

We have a contribution that tries to address this: #6

@SebastianSchmidl
Copy link
Member Author

SebastianSchmidl commented Apr 6, 2023

Base feature implemented in #6 (merged). The following points are still open:

  • Test interaction with the formula API
  • How to deal with existing ground truth information. The current implementation assumes a clean time series.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request 🏅 very low MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant