Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Agreed! The These patterns would also mirror how the USEEIO v2.0 data package references "the precise USEEIO model version" from which it was generated without requiring the version numbers be identical. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Implemented a new spec |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The proposed change makes sense to me. Can you remind me of the formal name for the package relative to the flow list itself. If the names are easily distinguishable, confusion over version number seems less likely. Based on above posts, it seems like the updated name for the flow list itself would be fedelemflowlist v1.3? What would shorthand for the package be? Based on README text it seems like the package itself is named the same thing... @bl-young |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently the package version and the flow list version are the same. This can cause confusion when a new version of the package is released but does not involve any changes to the flow list (e.g., new mapping files, new features, etc.).
I propose that we make a clean break such that the version of the flowlist does not have to align with the version of the fedelemflowlist package. However, the flowlist would indicate which version of fedelemflowlist created it.
I'm open to suggestions on where or how to make this transition.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions