-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add processing module for Webgazer data #66
Comments
You might have a look whether this is something up the sleeve of iSpector: https://github.com/UiL-OTS-labs/iSpector . I've found many difficulties of finding a "default" format for eyetracking movement. Commonly the main research grade eye tracker use/support there own stuff with their own rather expensive software. |
What's the reasoning behind making it a feature of the datastore, instead of making it a simple standalone script for example? |
@tymees People already use the datastore, and it's the only place where this script would ever be used. So it makes sense to integrate it. @maartenuni Thanks for mentioning iSpector, I will try to use the same output format where possible. It might be cool to add this to iSpector as well, but once again literally the only place that this specific jspsych+webgazer json input format would ever come from is this datastore. So I would actually kind of see it as unnecessary complexity added to iSpector. |
Data coming in from jsPsych's Webgazer plugin comes in a rather obtuse JSON package per trial. It would be of great assistance to researchers if it resembled more common eye-tracking data formats.
Something like this:
Of course, the datastore should always provide raw data on demand. This processed format would be a supplementary function when Webgazer data is detected. Some basic modularity to meet future processing needs is desirable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: