-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lemmas for adverbs and adjectives #20
Comments
(dev, not test) |
Will fix. |
Adverbs ending in -ly have new lemmas |
Excellent, thank you! I went looking for LinES has:
whereas EWT will have
|
Lemmas of ADVs ending in -ly and ADJs ending in -ed or -ing have been corrected. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was wondering why the performance of our lemmatizer is so poor on the LinES dev set, and I came across a few classes of differences between the standard used in EWT and GUM vs LinES. One in particular is that of adjectives and adverbs. In EWT and GUM, adjectives and adverbs are lemmatized as their own words, whereas in LinES they are lemmatized as the verb (or adj, in the case of adv) they are related to. A partial list from the dev set is:
It would be great if we could unify this standard. I could send in a PR if that would help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: