You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After watching this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE2h5yq6znY I like the idea of calling the idea of the general subscription of providers a Multipass. However I disagree with calling it a Web Multipass. I think the core technology should not be obfuscated to the users, and instead the Multipass term solo should be the general noun used to describe a provider's subscription. Multipass when named in short, and its full name should be the Web Monetization Multipass as a the concept any provider of Web Monetization subscriptions can use.
The Web Monetization Multipass logo should be treated like a Visa or MasterCard style logo. It does not need the "Unlock with a Multipass" or "Get benefits with a Multipass" instead it as a logo should simply be a presence which says that Web Monetization is possible, and the site which has the content can then describe what that means for their service or whatever be in no ads, extra content, or something else.
In logos it could be Web Monetization on top in small text, and MULTIPASS in bold on bottom. Then the official WM site can have a section explaining the loose Multipass concept being a general subscription service providers may offer and decide how to handle but will generally allow access to all WM content on the web.
This is where I would describe the concept and in the future link to Coil and other providers who begin to sell a Multipass in some form http://webmonetization.org/multipass
discussionA discussion thread pondering a meta-topic that may lead to specific proposals
1 participant
Converted from issue
This discussion was converted from issue #138 on September 07, 2021 09:27.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
After watching this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE2h5yq6znY I like the idea of calling the idea of the general subscription of providers a Multipass. However I disagree with calling it a Web Multipass. I think the core technology should not be obfuscated to the users, and instead the Multipass term solo should be the general noun used to describe a provider's subscription. Multipass when named in short, and its full name should be the Web Monetization Multipass as a the concept any provider of Web Monetization subscriptions can use.
The Web Monetization Multipass logo should be treated like a Visa or MasterCard style logo. It does not need the "Unlock with a Multipass" or "Get benefits with a Multipass" instead it as a logo should simply be a presence which says that Web Monetization is possible, and the site which has the content can then describe what that means for their service or whatever be in no ads, extra content, or something else.
In logos it could be Web Monetization on top in small text, and MULTIPASS in bold on bottom. Then the official WM site can have a section explaining the loose Multipass concept being a general subscription service providers may offer and decide how to handle but will generally allow access to all WM content on the web.
This is where I would describe the concept and in the future link to Coil and other providers who begin to sell a Multipass in some form http://webmonetization.org/multipass
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions