-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combined inch-foot mentions should be combined into one conversion of distance. #22
Comments
To add to your proposition, I know that pounds and ounces (mass units) are used in a similar way, and since I don't hear a number of the units like stones and bushels in colloquial use, I can't say that they aren't used similarly. I think it is reasonable to assume in general that if a unit x and a unit y are of the same type, and y is more precise than x, the phrase Here's some test cases that should work when we're done, whether we generalize and implement without directly naming inches, feet, pounds, or ounces, or if we implement specifically: A potential related issue is sub-sub-units. Although the only case I can think of is degrees-minutes-seconds, and these are not supported units from the bot, the bot would not support converting Proposed Fixes
Cheers! |
I would also like to add that stone and pounds suffers from the same issue. User:
UnitCorrector:
In Britain, Imperial weight is usually given in stone and pounds, rather than pounds alone. Because Britain. |
Currently, message
I am 1 inch 3 feet.
corrects toI am 2.54 cm 0.914 m.
.Rather, it would be favourable if it'd result in one combined SI unit:
I am 0.93 m.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: