-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upload cached corrections and to-download info #151
Comments
Assuming we have to live with 5k cap, we basically can only have 30% at most for our full computational power. |
We observed >8 connection for a typical already before making. Something need to be improved here, which is basically initialized and not really used until we call related DB operation. |
Isn't this issue solved by this PR - XENONnT/utilix#122? |
@rsriya I am not sure it fully solves the story. I would say at least it helps. |
It is not totally solved by that. But it can help a bit. |
This PR will reduce the connection: XENONnT/admix#59. But I am worrying about the too-large discrepancy between the master and stable branch of admix, which might result in another round of cleaning after we merge them. |
I marked this PR as wontfix because the less DB connection after XENONnT/admix#59 is expected. And it could be dangerous if we download and upload the corrections maps. |
Triggered by discussion here. The concern is currently outsource is occupying too many DB connection, endangering DB service. We need to deeply understand where DB is called first.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: