Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding random noise to a signal will not hide the signal #1

Open
greggman opened this issue Aug 19, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Adding random noise to a signal will not hide the signal #1

greggman opened this issue Aug 19, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@greggman
Copy link

Or so I've been told by security experts.

A quick google search found this paper

http://www.csee.umbc.edu/~hillol/PUBS/kargupta_privacy03a.pdf

@Xodarap
Copy link
Owner

Xodarap commented Aug 20, 2013

Thanks for the comment Gregg.

Obviously they're talking about a very different problem, but I would agree with their assertion that obfuscation doesn't help if you still have a high signal-to-noise ratio. (They use a cutoff of one, which sounds reasonable to me.)

I would be interested in seeing applications to this specific problem if you have any? An SNR of 1 for browsing does not seem at all problematic here, but I don't want to read too much into that specific paper, as it wasn't really related.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants