You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Todd Wilson (@lambdacalculator) suggests in the Abella mailing list that we should add a unfold named_clause with ... form to handle cases such as:
%:tapp:
of (tapp P E) (T P) :- typ P, of E (all T).
Here an invocation such as unfold tapp with T = ... might allow the clause to be potentially unfolded because it is no longer non-pattern after the substitution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Todd Wilson (@lambdacalculator) suggests in the Abella mailing list that we should add a
unfold named_clause with ...
form to handle cases such as:Here an invocation such as
unfold tapp with T = ...
might allow the clause to be potentially unfolded because it is no longer non-pattern after the substitution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: