Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Populate feature compliance for Realtime: Authentication: Get Confirmed Client Identifier #374

Open
QuintinWillison opened this issue Aug 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Populate feature compliance for Realtime: Authentication: Get Confirmed Client Identifier #374

QuintinWillison opened this issue Aug 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to public interface documentation (API reference or readme).

Comments

@QuintinWillison
Copy link
Contributor

QuintinWillison commented Aug 14, 2022 •
edited by sync-by-unito bot
Loading

Added to the canonical feature list in ably/features#19.

At that time it wasn't a trivial task for me to confirm this functionality was implemented correctly, according to the spec, in this SDK.

Until the manifest for this SDK has been moved to this repository, the work to be done under this issue will need to be made in the manifest file over in the features repository's incubation / prototypes folder.

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
@sync-by-unito Sync by Unito
Copy link

sync-by-unito bot commented Feb 17, 2024

➤ Automation for Jira commented:

The link to the corresponding Jira issue is https://ably.atlassian.net/browse/ECO-4059

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian added the documentation Improvements or additions to public interface documentation (API reference or readme). label Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to public interface documentation (API reference or readme).
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@QuintinWillison @lawrence-forooghian