-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Abnormal Average RD and results when use cnvnator #277
Comments
Hi,
sorry for later reply.
CNVnator is not designed to be used with WES data. You can try to do so at your own risk. If you do then you have to use large bins size to make sure that most bins get good amount of mapped reads. As I see from the output you provided coverage per bin you are using (1000 bp) is too small.
Alexej Abyzov, Ph.D.
Senior Associate Consultant,
Associate Professor of Biomedical Informatics,
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences,
Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic
-----------------------------
Mayo Clinic, 200 1st street SW, Harwick 7-91
Rochester, MN 55905
www.abyzovlab.org
tel: +1-(507)-538-0978
On Mar 21, 2023, at 12:19 PM, Chipmunks22 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi ! I'm using cnvnator to call CNV with my WES data.This is the command I use:
cnvnator -root sample.root -tree sample.bam -chrom $(seq 1 22) X Y -genome hg19
cnvnator -root sample.root -his 1000 -chrom $(seq 1 22) X Y -d /path_to_chr.fa
cnvnator -root sample.root -stat 1000 -d /path_to_chr.fa
cnvnator -root sample.root -partition 1000
cnvnator -root sample.root -call 1000 >sample.txt
When I use cnvnator -root sample.root -partition 1000 -d /path_to_chr.fa, I get this message:
Average RD per bin (1-22) is 0.245291 +- 2.51832 (before GC correction)
Average RD per bin (X,Y) is 7.09492e-14 +- 2.14621 (before GC correction)
Correcting counts by GC-content for '1' ...
Zero value of GC average.
Bin 13103 with center 1.31025e+07 is not corrected.
Correcting counts by GC-content for '2' ...
Correcting counts by GC-content for '3' ...
Zero value of GC average.
Bin 145439 with center 1.45438e+08 is not corrected.
Correcting counts by GC-content for '4' ...
Correcting counts by GC-content for '5' ...
The "Average RD per bin"looks abnormal,dose it too samll?
Despite this,I find that the normalized_RD in my results is abnormal too.It haven't been normalized that the value is larger than 1. Why dose this happen?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fabyzovlab%2FCNVnator%2Fissues%2F277&data=05%7C01%7CAbyzov.Alexej%40mayo.edu%7Cb3d0fa637a564a90a2fc08db29ed6ea2%7Ca25fff9c3f634fb29a8ad9bdd0321f9a%7C0%7C0%7C638149871979883051%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GBwHWbDRYxG%2Brhu8FT%2FDLEnbMFLu1MmxgHfnz6OcXNQ%3D&reserved=0>, or unsubscribe<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FACLKGONB6ETXXNDJFQUNB43W5FXDNANCNFSM6AAAAAAWCE5BGE&data=05%7C01%7CAbyzov.Alexej%40mayo.edu%7Cb3d0fa637a564a90a2fc08db29ed6ea2%7Ca25fff9c3f634fb29a8ad9bdd0321f9a%7C0%7C0%7C638149871979883051%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Cmky5d77Zm%2FdtU4D9PXRHiLhK0mbfOTvARLQV%2BYQ7LI%3D&reserved=0>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi ! I'm using cnvnator to call CNV with my WES data.This is the command I use:
When I use
cnvnator -root sample.root -partition 1000 -d /path_to_chr.fa
, I get this message:Average RD per bin (1-22) is 0.245291 +- 2.51832 (before GC correction)
Average RD per bin (X,Y) is 7.09492e-14 +- 2.14621 (before GC correction)
Correcting counts by GC-content for '1' ...
Zero value of GC average.
Bin 13103 with center 1.31025e+07 is not corrected.
Correcting counts by GC-content for '2' ...
Correcting counts by GC-content for '3' ...
Zero value of GC average.
Bin 145439 with center 1.45438e+08 is not corrected.
Correcting counts by GC-content for '4' ...
Correcting counts by GC-content for '5' ...
The "Average RD per bin"looks abnormal,dose it too samll?
Despite this,I find that the normalized_RD in my results is abnormal too.It haven't been normalized that the value is larger than 1. Why dose this happen?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: