Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update freetype to a newer version to support loongson jdk build #3120

Open
Panxuefeng-loongson opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement Issues that enhance the code or documentation of the repo in any way

Comments

@Panxuefeng-loongson
Copy link

Hi all:

I'm a member of the openjdk development team from Loongson. In the near future, we intend to add to the adpotium build process. I have updated the build scripts in temurin-build repo and build loongson jdk natively on my system. freetype's config.guess is not up to date, so when configure, there will be an error and terminate. The newer version of freetype already supports LoongArch, I think we would need to use a newer freetype version to support LoongArch build. After that, we will launch pr to support building and distributing binaries of loongson jdk via AdoptOpenJDK.

Thanks

@karianna karianna added the enhancement Issues that enhance the code or documentation of the repo in any way label Oct 17, 2022
@Panxuefeng-loongson Panxuefeng-loongson changed the title Update freetype to a newer version Update freetype to a newer version to support loongson jdk build Oct 22, 2022
@Panxuefeng-loongson
Copy link
Author

Hi all:

What are the plans for the freetype version update?

Thanks

@karianna
Copy link
Contributor

We are currently in a release cycle but will likely discuss this in our slack channel in the coming weeks

adoptium.net/slack

@tellison
Copy link
Contributor

tellison commented Nov 8, 2022

See also #3127

@gdams
Copy link
Member

gdams commented Dec 22, 2022

#3188 might be beneficial here as it would allow us to clone a different source for the loongson build

@sxa
Copy link
Member

sxa commented Nov 29, 2023

Related: #3504
Which version included support for loongarch? If it's a version in the codebase then that change will be adequate as it won't be using a downloaded one, so as long as the version in the openjdk port codebase works, that'll be adequate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Issues that enhance the code or documentation of the repo in any way
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants