You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What are you trying to do? Look at the signatures of the EXE/DLL files in the Windows builds
Expected behaviour: There is a single Eclipse signature on the files
Observed behaviour: There are two eclipse signatures on the files. Also the original MSFT signatures on the MSVC redistributable files are (correctly) preserved whereas in previous releases they were not
Any other comments: This was likely as a result of a change from Eclipse to use jsign instead of osslsigncode which was using a parameter to replace existing signatures.
Potential courses of action here (assuming the status quo is undesirable, which is my view):
Modify our pipelines to avoid the signing being invoked twice on the same file
Modify our scripting to check for the presence of an EF signature before invoking the signing
Adjust the tool to only replace EF signatures
Set the option on the new tool to replace existing signatures which is what the previous tool did (not a great solution since it would wipe the MSFT signature on the redist DLLs)
What are you trying to do? Look at the signatures of the EXE/DLL files in the Windows builds
Expected behaviour: There is a single Eclipse signature on the files
Observed behaviour: There are two eclipse signatures on the files. Also the original MSFT signatures on the MSVC redistributable files are (correctly) preserved whereas in previous releases they were not
Any other comments: This was likely as a result of a change from Eclipse to use jsign instead of osslsigncode which was using a parameter to replace existing signatures.
Potential courses of action here (assuming the status quo is undesirable, which is my view):
Discussion thread in slack with screenshot of the issue: https://adoptium.slack.com/archives/C09NW3L2J/p1729001400776759?thread_ts=1728988912.817729&cid=C09NW3L2J
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: