Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
242 lines (135 loc) · 6.81 KB

Roadmap.md

File metadata and controls

242 lines (135 loc) · 6.81 KB

The equivalent of a constitution has been written, a tech stack has been chosen and high-level technical specifications have been made.

Constitution” covers bylaws, extra-bylaw rights, policies and protocols, dispute resolution.

  • The bylaws are written (not necessarily final draft – pre-lawyer).

    • Questions needing answers:

      • What is the scope of the holding company’s power? What is its relationship to the DCE?

      • What’s the deal with the IPO? Is it going to be a an ICO/securities offering?

      • Are the stakeholders controlling the company by some other means than stock?

    • Tasks:

      • Find way to stay up-to-date with Lynzee, Yue, and Stephanie.

      • Complete more research in risk-assessment, and other committees.

        • consult experts, attend training/conference?
      • Complete working draft

  • Extra-bylaw social protocols have been defined

    • Stakeholders are defined

      • Questions to answer:

        • Are our stakeholder groups project or product specific? Is each product a DCE? Is this too granular?

        • Are our stakeholder groups representing pillars of our business?

        • Are they representing certain pre-defined interests we want considered? Ex: ethics, employee rights, consumer protections, local community, web 3 education, investors, etc?

      • Tasks:

        • Work with Lynzee and Stephanie to follow developments on this subject.

        • Analyze hemp collaboration

        • Draft possible project-based SH groups

        • Draft possible pillar-based SH groups

    • Policy domains: who is responsible for what policies, and how can they be amended?

      • Questions:

        • Who decides about employee arbitration agreements?

        • Who decides/dictates data privacy policies?

        • Who decides family leave, salaries, hiring and firing practices? (HR?)

        • Is there a better way to protect worker rights and interests?

      • Tasks:

        • Establish strategy for employees to change policies.
    • Reputation system

      • Questions to answer:

        • Is the reputation system specific only to individuals? To teams? To stakeholder groups as a whole?

        • In what instances should we be considered equals, when should hierarchical roles determine power, and when should reputation play a part?

      • Tasks to be completed:

        • Make some proposals

        • Pilot some systems

        • Lead employee conversations to gather feedback

        • Pitch pilots to higher ups

        • Report results

    • Values, mission, purpose

      • Tasks to be completed:

        • Work with Elaina and Stephanie?
    • Internal governance and management

      • Questions to answer:

        • How do we organize power internally?

        • What is the relationship between internal/employee-level governance and board-level?

      • Tasks to be completed:

        • Research different governance and management styles and technologies

        • Attend some trainings

        • Pilot some systems

        • Lead employee conversations to gather feedback

        • Pitch pilots to higher ups

        • Report results

    • Values, mission, purpose

      • Tasks to be completed:

        • Work with Elaina and Stephanie?
  • Processes and Policies Established for Employee Arbitration Agreements, Dispute Resolution and Avoidance

    • Question:

      • What is our employee arbitration agreement?

      • Is it ethical?

      • How are other companies dealing with this in a way that we could benefit from?

      • What should our dispute resolution system be?

    • Tasks:

      • Work with Stephanie and Matt to understand existing structure

      • Research, summarize, and analyze best practices

      • Research Mattereum

      • See about potential Mattereum collaboration (asset-level governance)

      • Research Kleros

      • See about potential Kleros collaboration (decentralized arbitration)

      • More thoroughly research Colony’s dispute resolution

        • Off-chain pilot for IRL conflicts?
      • Draft dispute resolution proposal

Choose Tech stack means that I have identified which stacks we are building on and have designated responsibility for this work

  • Colony

    • Questions:

      • Will new developer team have say in this decision?

      • How might we layer Colony’s arbitration system with other systems, like Kleros?

    • Tasks:

      • Meeting May 7

      • Move forward (or not) based on May 7 meeting and Jeff’s input. Actions TBD

  • DAOstack Proposal

    • Tasks:

      • Write summary/presentation of how DAOstack could facilitate the DCE contrasting w/ Colony

        • How is Liberland combining Kleros and DAOstack?
      • Coordinate and build relationship with DAOstack

  • (potential) Mattereum Proposal

    • Tasks:

      • Research and report (executive summary) of Mattereum

      • If applicable, build relationship

      • If applicable, build presentation/proposal

  • (potential) Kleros Proposal

    • Tasks:

      • Research and report (executive summary) of Kleros

      • If applicable, build relationship

      • If applicable, build presentation/proposal

  • TBA Dev Team

    • Questions:

      • Might they be interested in starting from 0 and building something with us?

      • Are we even open to starting from 0?

      • Do they have something they already want to use?

      • What will my coordination with this team look like?

    • Tasks

      • Present my progress to them

      • Build relationship, establish coordination

Definition of a high-level technical specification means that I have identified which tech stacks we will use, that I understand from a very high level that what we want is possible with them, and delegated the work to developers to complete:

  • Write a full report of the tech stacks we want to use, and a whitepaper-esque non-technical document describing their integration.