-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support quiet output #61
Comments
Can't you just pipe the output to |
Not easily and portably! (It's not a shell script and it needs to run on platforms that aren't unixy.) |
I'd be interested to know what language you are using for this that doesn't have the ability to easily capture subprocess output in a portable mechanism. |
It's not that I can't capture output, but I don't care about it so don't want to capture it. (I'm using Rust.) |
Does |
It does; I managed to overlook it? Though I recall I wanted to redirect stdout to stderr so that output could still appear as well. In any case a "quiet" flag still seems generally useful. |
Not opposed to adding this feature - I think this would mainly add a flag that suppresses warnings and pass outputs, but still allow for errors to be emitted as part of the build process, likely to stderr. (Maybe warning suppression should fall under a different flag, with the --quiet flag implying the warning suppression flag... not sure.) |
A
-Q
command line option or something to suppress some output would be helpful for scripting; in particular the "Pass one..." messages and such.I have some code that's running spasm as a subprocess, and without a way to turn those messages off I can't easily ensure I only get my own code's output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: