-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multiple source files #961
Comments
This feature was dropped a while ago. I can look into re-adding it. |
Sadly. I think it would be good to re-add it if it does not complicate the code base too much. I like This will hide the long and scary paths to the source files of other plugins, and make the build process more flexible. |
My main motivation here is that it's better than having a "main.sp" that includes a bunch of source files. Also, many modern languages treat same-dir files as automatically part of a single package/module. It seems like a natural direction to go. The reason it got removed was during the transition to the new parser. That transition is long done, so we should be able to re-add this. |
This is going to be harder than I thought. The old compiler would concatenate all the source files together, which meant they had to be correctly ordered on the command line. I don't want to do that. Each source file should compile independently and then get linked together, which also means they should each get their own global scope, and have to re-import includes. Unfortunately... we don't have a linker, and I don't want to write one, since that's neither a useful nor a productive use of time. So I'll think about this a bit more. |
Most likely the real answer is to finally write a replacement for |
Thank you for taking the time to look into this issue. It's sad that the language has everything except a linker. It would be very cool to turn into a normal scripting language without boilerplate code, where each file can be treated as a module with its own constants, functions and more. |
Spitballing a bit, I can see this going in 3 directions. (1) Runtime linking. Compile every file into its own .smx - including stuff like (2) Compile-time linking, with AST merging. We'd build separate in-memory ASTs and symbol tables of every file, aggregate them together, then generate one big .smx file, as if they were never separate to begin with. It'd be heavy changes to spcomp and no changes to the VM. (3) Compile-time linking, with SMX merging. We'd do all the stages of compilation, then do the runtime linking from (1) that would have been in the VM, then write it out. Probably the most work of any option, but wouldn't require as invasive refactoring of the compiler as (2). I'll think about it for a little while. |
Help us help you
Environment
Description
A project consisting of multiple source files either does not compile or produces a warning.
Problematic Code (or Steps to Reproduce)
File:
plugin.sp
File:
module.sp
Logs
If you change the order of the source files to
module.sp plugin.sp
, you will get the following:If you add the
public
keyword before theModule_Foo
function, the project will compile, but the function will not be called:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: