Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 10, 2022. It is now read-only.

Why do you need to park? - is it possible to make the text more similar to the prototype? #729

Open
EUzkuraityte opened this issue Oct 19, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@EUzkuraityte
Copy link

EUzkuraityte commented Oct 19, 2017

  1. Presumably changes to the Radio button text is due to reason as specified in Start page - copy edits #723 .
    @lizziebruce @sanjaypoyzer - can you advice? - can we make it more relevant to the section question 'Why do you need to park?'

  2. Could we take off 'Select your permit type'

  3. Is it possible to make the text look more like the prototype, i.e. 'You need a permit to park here because [the address pull ed from the previous pages] is in the Morpeth parking zone.' - hyperlink the 'Morpeth parking zone' and get rid of 'check the permit...' sentence.

screen shot 2017-10-19 at 14 11 38

@joanneSouthern
Copy link

We reviewed with the business lead and she asked us to change it

@lizziebruce
Copy link
Contributor

@EUzkuraityte @joanneSouthern please see my feedback note on this too.

@EUzkuraityte
Copy link
Author

EUzkuraityte commented Oct 23, 2017

Here are lizzie's comments:
/resident-choice Please edit the content so that it reflects the prototype https://verify-local-patterns.herokuapp.com/service-patterns/parking-permit/example-service/resident-choice
'Morpeth parking zone' should be the link so there's no need for 'Check the permit area map'. Also no need to introduce the choices with Select your permit type.

Linking to #744 for parking scheme solution

@joanneSouthern
Copy link

The link is separate as its a button converted to a link as the forms don't navigate to different pages in a traditional html url and the text is created via a stored procedure in the database, so the post code doesn't pull through as its not stored in the database, just the uprn.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants