You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 05:14:19PM -0700, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
The original assumed LE archs: http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/spooky.html
I wonder if it has been fixed ever since.
Not that I know of. But perhaps it just works assuming you don't want to
interoperate with a LE producer.? After all hash functions
may be tolerant of some permutations. Perhaps just run it through
smhasher?
Thank you. Yeah, upon reading a few references I came to a conclusion that it should just not be compared to LE value-wise. But algorithm itself should work fine.
The original assumed LE archs: http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/spooky.html
I wonder if it has been fixed ever since.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: