[Support finer elasticsearch index storage] #9751
samz-github
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
That is a dead end. SkyWalking decreases the number of indices from version to version because too many indices is an over kill for ElasticSearch cluster. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Search before asking
Description
In my cooperation, we use skywalking to monitor high traffic microservice. Now everyday there are almost elasticsearch 2TB storage size only for the segment index. And it will be grow more storage size as more related microservices are added to Skywalking system. For now, 2TB in only 1 segment elasticsearch index is too big. It will be better if Skywalking can support fine grained segment index for each monitored microservice but not only 1 segment index each day.
Use case
For example, we use skywalking monitor three microservices: account-svc, payment-svc, product-svc. For now, each day there is 1 segment elasticsearch index to store the Skywalking segment records, index name: sw_segment-20221010, 2TB size for this index. It will be good if skywalking can divide this index to three indices: sw_segment-account-svc-20221010, sw_segment-payment-svc-20221010, sw_segment-product-svc-20221010.
Related issues
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
Code of Conduct
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions