-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[VOTE] Replace codeowners with more relevant automation #10471
Comments
+1 |
4 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
enthusiastic +1 from community contributor |
+1 |
2 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
I'm not particularly unhappy with the current situation, but it could be improved. |
+1 |
2 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
Merged
+1 |
2 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
Hi all, The vote result is +16: Therefore the resolution is accepted and the RFC will be merged. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi all,
This is a formal vote thread to determine committer and PMC support for [RFC] Replace codeowners with more relevant automation. Replying +1 here means you support the RFC and we should merge it. This vote thread is due to the fact that the RFC proposes a change in the way the community operates (namely the way code-review works). This also signals the final comment period on that RFC, which will conclude with this vote.
We'll leave this vote thread open for a week, and make a decision then.
Thanks,
Andrew
Please vote:
+1 I support the RFC
0 I'm happy either way
-1 I do not support the RFC and it should not be merged.
@apache/tvm-committers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: