Skip to content

Precise type checking for records #789

konnov started this conversation in Ideas + Research
Apr 30, 2021 · 8 comments · 19 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 8 comments 19 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
4 replies
@konnov
Comment options

konnov Apr 30, 2021
Maintainer Author

@konnov
Comment options

konnov Apr 30, 2021
Maintainer Author

@lemmy
Comment options

@Isaac-DeFrain
Comment options

Comment options

konnov
May 1, 2021
Maintainer Author

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@konnov
Comment options

konnov May 3, 2021
Maintainer Author

@shonfeder
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
7 replies
@konnov
Comment options

konnov May 4, 2021
Maintainer Author

@shonfeder
Comment options

@konnov
Comment options

konnov May 4, 2021
Maintainer Author

@konnov
Comment options

konnov May 4, 2021
Maintainer Author

@shonfeder
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@konnov
Comment options

konnov May 4, 2021
Maintainer Author

@konnov
Comment options

konnov May 4, 2021
Maintainer Author

Comment options

konnov
May 30, 2021
Maintainer Author

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

konnov
Aug 10, 2021
Maintainer Author

You must be logged in to vote
4 replies
@shonfeder
Comment options

@shonfeder
Comment options

@konnov
Comment options

konnov Nov 23, 2021
Maintainer Author

@shonfeder
Comment options

Comment options

konnov
Aug 12, 2022
Maintainer Author

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FTC-Snowcat Feature: Fully-functional type checker Snowcat
4 participants