Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Voting: add contextual data fields for votes #596

Open
john-light opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Voting: add contextual data fields for votes #596

john-light opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@john-light
Copy link
Contributor

It would be nice if users could easily find more contextual information about a vote.

For example, in the recent AGP-1 vote we put a link to the raw AGP-1 file directly in the vote question. This is a bit clunky. It would be nice if, instead, there were a couple of extra fields such as:

Resource link:
Discussion link:

Users could then link to a github/IPFS/swarm/ etc file for the resource link and a forum or chat room for the discussion link.

@john-light
Copy link
Contributor Author

john-light commented Nov 23, 2018

Related to / possibly superseded by: aragon/client#452

@sohkai
Copy link
Contributor

sohkai commented Dec 1, 2018

We could make a proper spec out of the Survey metadata and support it in the Voting app: #231 (comment).

@sohkai sohkai changed the title Add contextual data fields for votes Voting: add contextual data fields for votes Mar 18, 2020
@danimesq
Copy link

This should be prioritized.

@paalex
Copy link

paalex commented Sep 18, 2020

I can try and make a PR that makes the current input (question) multiline, to make it easier to input longer text. If I see that it's not too complicated to add additional fields, I can give it a go

@danimesq
Copy link

CC @john-light (pls remember how yearn.finance's votes have context) and consider prioritizing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants