You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The same workflow definition would be agnostic to choice of artifact repository store, it can be s3, gcs, oss, and maybe hdfs (if path is mapped to key).
Note, I do not have plans to use this feature yet, but it may making key-only artifacts more useful that I can consider in the future.
Message from the maintainers:
Impacted by this bug? Give it a 👍. We prioritise the issues with the most 👍.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
I was looking at the new key-only artifact support: #4618.
It looks awesome and very useful.
However, it seems to me that there's a missing piece. A workflow may use key-only artifacts like the example:
https://github.com/argoproj/argo/blob/master/examples/key-only-artifact.yaml
However, the definition is still tied to s3. I think it helps if the definition can be artifact repository agnostic, for example
Use Cases
The same workflow definition would be agnostic to choice of artifact repository store, it can be s3, gcs, oss, and maybe hdfs (if path is mapped to key).
Note, I do not have plans to use this feature yet, but it may making key-only artifacts more useful that I can consider in the future.
Message from the maintainers:
Impacted by this bug? Give it a 👍. We prioritise the issues with the most 👍.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: