Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some differences I've noted from the Torch WRN implementation #3

Open
RaananHadar opened this issue Jun 28, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@RaananHadar
Copy link

Hi,
2 things:

  1. Using the 26 layer code, i've reached 93% accuracy on cifar-10. Which is the same as you currently had for the 40 layer version.
  2. re: the dataset used in the torch implementation. Please note that it uses a dataset that was already prewhitened and uses a global contrast normalization with a scale value of 55.

As a final note, I would suggest that you normalize the data by 255 so it would be from 0 to 1. Please take note that I have tried training on such a normalized set, It did not improve the performance significantly. The main difference from the torch implementation seems to be in the augmentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant