You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hipscat-import I think has pipeline options that support using the index to import with no ra and dec columns, but our catalog_info files have ra and dec columns as required fields. Should we have some better way in metadata to indicate that a catalog doesn't have explicit ra and dec columns?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The imported data does not have ra/dec, but the index would link to a different catalog that does have ra/dec? I believe that we had cases like that. Is that what you imagine? I am not sure that I would understand importing data that would have no spatial information.
Yeah, that's the case I'm thinking of, and I think we have tests in hipscat-import that support this. (Although now with the healpix_29 index we'll need to use another column to link to the original catalog.)
The main thing this issue is for is that in the catalog_info file, we have the ra_column and dec_column parameters, which are required to have a value currently. I think when we import a catalog with no ra and dec columns, these are filled with the default column names ra and dec, which is incorrect. So if we want to support catalogs without the columns, these params should probably change to optional and we'll have to check for it everywhere.
hipscat-import
I think has pipeline options that support using the index to import with no ra and dec columns, but our catalog_info files have ra and dec columns as required fields. Should we have some better way in metadata to indicate that a catalog doesn't have explicit ra and dec columns?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: