You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That's a neat idea, I've wanted but never seen a measured table for azimuthally-resolved altitude constraints. I'm curious – what kind of observations do you do so near to the horizon?
The only way to satisfy this for now is to take the maximum altitude from your table and provided it as the minimum in the altitude constraint.
the kind of measurements I do is with Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes from the Northern Hemisphere looking at sources along the galactic plane at positions or energy thresholds that require very large zenith angles
our observatory sits near a mountain/volcano so on one side of the observatory the mountain profile covers part of the field of view between 60° and 90° degrees zenith
According to your documentation this doesn't seem possible.
I have an astropy table with zenith and azimuth columns containing measurements of the horizon profile as seen from an observatory.
I would like to define the altitude constraint for my observation by using the measurements values.
The implementation of this might be done in this way:
.from_table()
to theAltitudeConstraint
class to load the tablemin
/max
values, than the max altitude value is given by the zenith profileAltitudeConstraint.compute_constraint
to account also for the azimutal progression of the transitThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: