Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Match exhaustiveness check #1

Open
csi-adziahel opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Match exhaustiveness check #1

csi-adziahel opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@csi-adziahel
Copy link

The case when not all cases are matched should be addressed, with an exception (Haskell-style) or a warning (OCaml-style). /me prefers Haskell and optional wrapper that catches an exception and issues a warning.
@ShalokShalom
Copy link

I agree on that and ask myself, if this library is still actually usable now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ShalokShalom @csi-adziahel