Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Queries do not include __typename #898

Closed
5 tasks done
eettaa opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

Queries do not include __typename #898

eettaa opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 8 comments
Labels
codegen duplicate This issue or pull request already exists feature-request New feature or request

Comments

@eettaa
Copy link

eettaa commented Oct 18, 2022

Before opening, please confirm:

  • I have installed the latest version of the Amplify CLI (see above), and confirmed that the issue still persists.
  • I have searched for duplicate or closed issues.
  • I have read the guide for submitting bug reports.
  • I have done my best to include a minimal, self-contained set of instructions for consistently reproducing the issue.
  • I have removed any sensitive information from my code snippets and submission.

How did you install the Amplify CLI?

No response

If applicable, what version of Node.js are you using?

No response

Amplify CLI Version

n/a

What operating system are you using?

n/a

Did you make any manual changes to the cloud resources managed by Amplify? Please describe the changes made.

n/a

Amplify Categories

api

Amplify Commands

codegen

Describe the bug

aws-amplify/amplify-codegen#445 has hung in pending triage for nearly four months without response but is actively blocking TS development. Reopening this bug as a plea for process review/friendly nudging of the relevant people on the aws side to actually please take a look at that bug.

Expected behavior

(literal): codegen'ed queries include __typename
(meta): there is some way to actually prod for updates on bugs (and/or explicit communication that they will not be addressed, but that to me would be a reason to move off of Amplify).

Not trying to be harsh- please let me know if I can help with a fix/help in any way to resolve this problem!

Reproduction steps

aws-amplify/amplify-codegen#445

GraphQL schema(s)

# Put schemas below this line

Project Identifier

No response

Log output

# Put your logs below this line


Additional information

No response

@josefaidt josefaidt transferred this issue from aws-amplify/amplify-cli Oct 18, 2022
@josefaidt josefaidt added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists feature-request New feature or request codegen pending-review labels Oct 18, 2022
@josefaidt
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @eettaa 👋 thanks for raising this and apologies for the delay on the codegen issue! I've marked this as a duplicate feature request of #445 and have bumped this with the team 🙂

@eettaa
Copy link
Author

eettaa commented Oct 18, 2022

Just checking here- it was marked as duplicate of aws-amplify/amplify-codegen#445, right? the link in your comment points to a different bug...

Thanks!

@arsene-riaworx
Copy link

any update on this? Indeed #445 is a different bug!

@dhallX
Copy link

dhallX commented Nov 15, 2022

having same issue any update?

@josefaidt
Copy link
Contributor

Hey folks apologies for the confusion, and great callout! Yes, this is a duplicate of the codegen issue aws-amplify/amplify-codegen#445, not #445 here in this repository.

@eettaa
Copy link
Author

eettaa commented Jan 20, 2023

Thanks @josefaidt for your response... any chance there's an update on the real bug as well? (aws-amplify/amplify-codegen#445)

@AnilMaktala
Copy link
Member

Hey @eettaa, This issue has been resolved in the latest version. Hence, closing this issue.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

This issue is now closed. Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please open a new issue that references this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
codegen duplicate This issue or pull request already exists feature-request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants