You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, Eye of Acherus doesn't have invisibility ability.
In the action bar has appeared a new button that should not be there (button 5, Flight).
In the action bar there is auto-attack button.
I also tried this quest in august and there was these problems:
When Eye of Acherus is invisible, mobs hook it without attacking it.
It seems that Eye of Acherus summon the wrong number of ghouls.
Recall Eye of Acherus ability doesn't work.
It should have Invisibility ability
Npcs shouldn't hook it when it is invisible
Eye of Acherus should summon as ghouls as the number of npcs in the spell area.
Recal Eye of Acherus ability should work.
It shouldn't have auto-attack button.
it shouldn't have Flight ability button.
Current Behaviour
I tried this quest in two different moments.
Currently, Eye of Acherus doesn't have invisibility ability.
In the action bar has appeared a new button that should not be there (button 5, Flight).
In the action bar there is auto-attack button.
I also tried this quest in august and there was these problems:
When Eye of Acherus is invisible, mobs hook it without attacking it.
It seems that Eye of Acherus summon the wrong number of ghouls.
Recall Eye of Acherus ability doesn't work.
Evidence (from August): Youtube
Evidence (from September): Youtube
How it should work: Youtube
Expected Blizzlike Behaviour
It should have Invisibility ability
Npcs shouldn't hook it when it is invisible
Eye of Acherus should summon as ghouls as the number of npcs in the spell area.
Recal Eye of Acherus ability should work.
It shouldn't have auto-attack button.
it shouldn't have Flight ability button.
Source
No response
Steps to reproduce the problem
Extra Notes
No response
AC rev. hash/commit
784e806
Operating system
Windows 11
Custom changes or Modules
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: