You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the file LICENSE-BouncyCastle.html it is mentioned that the library is licensed under LGPL 3 and MPL 2.0. However, according to information in the LICENSE file, the project is under a MIT license.
Is the LGPL 3 and MPL 2.0 license an incorrect statement or do these licenses apply in addition to the MIT license?
If there is a mistake in the listing of LGPL 3 and MPL 2.0, please correct it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the file LICENSE-BouncyCastle.html it is mentioned that the library is licensed under LGPL 3 and MPL 2.0. However, according to information in the LICENSE file, the project is under a MIT license.
Is the LGPL 3 and MPL 2.0 license an incorrect statement or do these licenses apply in addition to the MIT license?
If there is a mistake in the listing of LGPL 3 and MPL 2.0, please correct it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: