Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Progress of BeyondCTL implementation compared to qsctl #106

Open
1 of 2 tasks
abyss-w opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Progress of BeyondCTL implementation compared to qsctl #106

abyss-w opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@abyss-w
Copy link
Contributor

abyss-w commented Nov 11, 2021

qsctl has these commands: cat, cp, ls, mb, mv, presign, rb, rm, shell, sync, tee.

Implemented

Documentation: https://beyondstorage.io/docs/beyond-ctl/index

In progress

  • Not yet

Not implemented yet

  • sync

After BeyondCTL has implemented all of qsctl's commands, BeyondCTL will begin to replace qsctl.

@Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor

Xuanwo commented Nov 11, 2021

We can drop shell, mb, rbd for now (we will add them later).

@abyss-w
Copy link
Contributor Author

abyss-w commented Nov 11, 2021

We can drop shell, mb, rbd for now (we will add them later).

Okay.

@Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor

Xuanwo commented Nov 11, 2021

And maybe we need to set up our integration test? Along with the Chinese docs.

@abyss-w
Copy link
Contributor Author

abyss-w commented Nov 11, 2021

And maybe we need to set up our integration test? Along with the Chinese docs.

Yeah, maybe we need to do that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants