Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Approval rate statistics #2

Open
kmh11 opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Approval rate statistics #2

kmh11 opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@kmh11
Copy link
Member

kmh11 commented Aug 20, 2019

A graph of percentage of quotes approved over time (cumulative)

@tybug
Copy link

tybug commented Nov 8, 2019

Is there a table that says when a quote was approved? django_admin_log or qdb_quote don't have a date_approved field.

@defund
Copy link
Member

defund commented Nov 8, 2019

Nope, and the previous database doesn't contain that data either(?) Regardless, I think the timestamp and approved fields are enough, since moderators are expected to review quotes regularly.

@tybug
Copy link

tybug commented Nov 9, 2019

Got it.

It seems that this graph would trend towards some percent as time increases, with recent approvals/denies having very little effect on the thousands pf previous quotes. Would a graph with each point considering only the past 30 days be more useful?

@defund
Copy link
Member

defund commented Nov 10, 2019

Yeah, I don't think a cumulative graph is the best way to represent proportions. If anything, maybe a histogram with each bin being a year? This is all @kmh11 's idea anyways; ping ping

@kmh11
Copy link
Member Author

kmh11 commented Nov 10, 2019

This was actually Reynald's idea. I agree that a histogram is probably best. A possible (kind of hacky) way to do this would be to count used IDs out of total IDs for a time period, since unapproved quotes get deleted and their ID gets skipped over.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants