CIP30DataSigner.signData Produces a Different Signature and Key Compared to Eternl

[fabianbormann]

I am using the CIP30DataSigner like this:

CIP30DataSigner.INSTANCE.signData(userAccount.baseAddress().getBytes(), message.getBytes(), userAccount);

However, when I use the same user account with Eternl to sign the exact same message using the same requested address (showing up in the popup window), it produces a different signature and key compared to the one I got from the CIP30DataSigner.

I’m happy to provide more information if needed, but I currently suspect that my usage or understanding might simply be incorrect.

[satran004]

@fabianbormann Let me check this