-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix projects decorator #1547
Fix projects decorator #1547
Conversation
PR Summary
|
/integration sha=ca27e4da9511f9daa8166e66be4319c2b5bf415d |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
/integration sha=9332c5c99ccfbdadbf8601011b2837419ec4c07e |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
/integration sha=ca27e4d |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
1 similar comment
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
/integration sha=f682cc0 |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
/integration sha=9daf86b |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
This reverts commit 9daf86b.
/integration sha=7b45ee1 |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
/integration sha=ca27e4d |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
/integration sha=ca27e4da9511f9daa8166e66be4319c2b5bf415d |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
❌ Oh no! Integration tests have failed |
/integration sha=fbc2067ba64e8f0d10151954886e618d891aa9b8 |
⌛ Integration tests are running... Check their status here 👈 |
✅ Integration tests have finished successfully! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I guess that you don't need other types different from string
and UUID
in the union, do you?
Description
After the changes introduced in #1469, it was found that read model projections where the join key was a nullable array gave a "TS1241: Unable to resolve signature of method decorator when called as an expression" compilation error. This happened in read models and entities like the following:
Changes
ProjectionMethod
type to appropriately handle this edge case.Checks