-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integration/optional header problem #9
Comments
One idea would be to treat them as part of a separate library (e.g. DateTime~Serialization). Maybe I can prototype this in boost_dep_graph. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently
boostdep
will report as a dependency every include of every header it finds within an include folder. It would be nice if there was a way to tellboostdep
that the header is optional, lets say with something like a comment line that containsboostdep:integration_header
. To sanitize misuse of such headers they must not be included from other headers within a library that are not marked as well optional. When integration header is used from other libraries it is considered a dependency though, and the mark should be ignored.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: