Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration/optional header problem #9

Open
Kojoley opened this issue Dec 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Integration/optional header problem #9

Kojoley opened this issue Dec 30, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@Kojoley
Copy link

Kojoley commented Dec 30, 2018

Currently boostdep will report as a dependency every include of every header it finds within an include folder. It would be nice if there was a way to tell boostdep that the header is optional, lets say with something like a comment line that contains boostdep:integration_header. To sanitize misuse of such headers they must not be included from other headers within a library that are not marked as well optional. When integration header is used from other libraries it is considered a dependency though, and the mark should be ignored.

@Mike-Devel
Copy link
Contributor

One idea would be to treat them as part of a separate library (e.g. DateTime~Serialization). Maybe I can prototype this in boost_dep_graph.

@Mike-Devel
Copy link
Contributor

Mike-Devel commented Mar 4, 2019

It would certainly get rid of the biggest dependency cycle:
boostdep-fine2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants