Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing de novo variant #129

Open
krukanna opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Missing de novo variant #129

krukanna opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@krukanna
Copy link

krukanna commented May 13, 2022

Hi @brentp,
I type possibly de novo variant and then try to confirm it in slivar. There are cases when slivar does not indicate it. Do you know what criteria are likely to exclude this variant?

My command:

/home/bioinf/Ania/De_novo/slivar/slivar expr \
   --pass-only \
   --vcf $VCF_ann \
   --ped $SAMPLES_RELATION \
   --gnotate /slivar/gnomad.hg38.genomes.v3.fix.zip \
   --js /slivar/slivar-functions.js \
   --out-vcf $DIR_OUTPUT/de_novo_output.vcf \
   --info 'INFO.impactful && INFO.gnomad_popmax_af < 0.05 && variant.FILTER == "PASS" && variant.ALT[0] != "*"' \
   --family-expr 'denovo:fam.every(segregating_denovo) && INFO.gnomad_popmax_af < 0.05'

FAM File:
#family_ID sample_ID paternal_ID maternal_ID sex phenotype (2 is case)
R1 sister father mother 2 2
R1 proband father mother 2 1
R1 mother 0 0 2 2
R1 father 0 0 1 2

Variant from vcf file:

CHROM  POS     ID      REF     ALT     QUAL    FILTER  INFO    FORMAT  sister      proband      mother      father
chr19   49597592        .       C       A       1234.27 PASS    AC=1;AF=0.004386;AN=228;CSQ=A|missense_variant|MODERATE|PRR12|ENSG00000126464|Transcript|ENST00000418929|protein_coding|4/14||||3730|3257|1086|P/Q|cCa/cAa||1||1||SNV|HGNC|HGNC:29217|YES|NM_020719.3|5|P2|CCDS46143.1|ENSP00000394510|Q9ULL5||UPI0001596889|1|tolerated(0.26)|probably_damaging(0.999)|PANTHER:PTHR14709&PANTHER:PTHR14709:SF1||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||,A|missense_variant|MODERATE|PRR12|ENSG00000126464|Transcript|ENST00000615927|protein_coding|2/12||||794|794|265|P/Q|cCa/cAa||1||1||SNV|HGNC|HGNC:29217|||5|A2||ENSP00000478000||A0A3Q5ADB5|UPI00001C200A|1|tolerated(0.11)|probably_damaging(0.997)|PANTHER:PTHR14709&PANTHER:PTHR14709:SF1||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||,A|regulatory_region_variant|MODIFIER|||RegulatoryFeature|ENSR00000592640||||||||||||1||||SNV|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||	GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL	0/0:41,0:41:99:0,99,1485        0/1:39,44:83:99:1255,0,1144     0/0:32,0:32:65:0,65,1084        0/0:42,0:42:99:0,102,1454

Could it be caused by the fam file? If at least one of the parents is unknown or case?

@brentp
Copy link
Owner

brentp commented May 13, 2022

That variant is only present in the unaffected sample. segregating_denovo, as written looks for variants that are only in the affected sample(s). You could modify the function to find those, but that's not how it's written now.

@krukanna
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your quick respond.
It's not actually unaffected, it's unknown status - I made a mistake, it was supposed to be R1 proband father mother 2 0
I also don't have any de novo, when I change FAM like this (everyone is case):

 #family_ID sample_ID paternal_ID maternal_ID sex phenotype (2 is case)
R1 sister father mother 1 2
R1 proband father mother 2 2
R1 mother 0 0 2 2
R1 father 0 0 1 2

So what if the other family members are affected (not completely healthy - it might be different disease)? Should I assume the others are unknown instead of case status?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants