-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Associate release pipeline and stage with test run #64
Comments
Almost ready to release this, but the API is not letting me define a display value for the "Release Stage". Do you think you could provide the JSON response for |
Hey, I assume you already got it working? Do you still need the JSON? |
I obviously pushed a new release with this feature, but in my environment both the extension and my release pipeline don't have the display name for the stage (the stage display name is vstfs:///ReleaseManagement/Environment/n). I could not replicate the screenshot you provided. Feedback is always welcome and I'm curious if it's working for you. |
I had the chance to test it this morning, and it looks good. This is how it looks like when using the Microsoft PublishTestResults task: This is how it looks like when using your task: By the way, it would be really helpful to navigate to the test run from the logs. The PublishTestResults task offers this by printing the link in the logs like this: Should I open a separate issue for this? |
Great feedback.
Few interesting observations:
I agree. For release notes clarity, I'd prefer to track it as a separate issue. |
All valid observations. However for me personally, that's all I currently need to work with the test run.
I opened issue #74 for the run link in the logs. |
We are using a classic release pipeline on Azure DevOps Server. When using the PublishTestResults@2 task from Microsoft, the test run includes a reference to the release pipeline and stage it was executed on. This helps navigating to the logs of the execution. Especially when opening the test run from the test case/test point (which is now possible since #20).
This is how it looks using PublishTestResults@2:
So my suggestion would be to associate the release pipeline and stage to the run, if applicable, of course.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: