Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New generic array impls require higher unwinding bounds for Kani #136

Open
adpaco-aws opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

New generic array impls require higher unwinding bounds for Kani #136

adpaco-aws opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
[C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. [E] Performance Track performance improvement (Time / Memory / CPU)

Comments

@adpaco-aws
Copy link
Collaborator

With the introduction of the impls for TypeGenerator and ValueGenerator in #131, the Kani back-end now requires higher unwinding values (see this change, for example).

We suspect that there's a way to avoid these higher unwinding values somehow, but it's unclear how.
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws added [C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. [E] Performance Track performance improvement (Time / Memory / CPU) labels Mar 31, 2023
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws changed the title New generic array impls require higher unwinding bounds New generic array impls require higher unwinding bounds for Kani back-end Mar 31, 2023
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws changed the title New generic array impls require higher unwinding bounds for Kani back-end New generic array impls require higher unwinding bounds for Kani Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
[C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. [E] Performance Track performance improvement (Time / Memory / CPU)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@adpaco-aws