Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[August 31, 2023]: [definition of 'specificity' needs to be rephrased] #595

Open
abhicc opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@abhicc
Copy link
Contributor

abhicc commented Aug 31, 2023

The current definition of 'specificity' states that it gives the False Negative Rate. Specificity actually gives the True Negative Rate.

@abhicc abhicc added the question Further information is requested label Aug 31, 2023
@elletjies
Copy link
Member

@abhicc thanks! Feel to put in a PR for our reviewers to take a further look.

@froggleston froggleston added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed question Further information is requested labels Jul 15, 2024
@sfmig
Copy link

sfmig commented Dec 3, 2024

This seems to be fixed now:

I opened a PR #761 for crosslinking this term but I think this issue can be safely closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants