This Helm Chart can be used to deploy your application container under a
Deployment resource onto your Kubernetes
cluster. You can use this Helm Chart to run and deploy a long-running container, such as a web service or backend
microservice. The container will be packaged into
Pods that are managed by the Deployment
controller.
This Helm Chart can also be used to front the Pods
of the Deployment
resource with a
Service to provide a stable endpoint to access the
Pods
, as well as load balance traffic to them. The Helm Chart can also specify
Ingress rules to further configure complex routing
rules in front of the Service
.
If you're using the chart to deploy to GKE, you can also use the chart to deploy a Google Managed SSL Certificate and associate it with the Ingress.
- See the root README for general instructions on using Gruntwork Helm Charts.
- See the examples folder for example usage.
- See the provided values.yaml file for the required and optional configuration values that you can set on this chart.
back to root README
The following resources will be deployed with this Helm Chart, depending on which configuration values you use:
Deployment
: The mainDeployment
controller that will manage the application container image specified in thecontainerImage
input value.- Secondary
Deployment
for use as canary: An optionalDeployment
controller that will manage a canary deployment of the application container image specified in thecanary.containerImage
input value. This is useful for testing a new application tag, in parallel to your stable tag, prior to rolling the new tag out. Created only if you configure thecanary.containerImage
values (and setcanary.enabled = true
). Service
: TheService
resource providing a stable endpoint that can be used to address toPods
created by theDeployment
controller. Created only if you configure theservice
input (and setservice.enabled = true
).ServiceMonitor
: TheServiceMonitor
describes the set of targets to be monitored by Prometheus. Created only if you configure the service input and setserviceMonitor.enabled = true
.Ingress
: TheIngress
resource providing host and path routing rules to theService
for the deployedIngress
controller in the cluster. Created only if you configure theingress
input (and setingress.enabled = true
).Horizontal Pod Autoscaler
: TheHorizontal Pod Autoscaler
automatically scales the number of pods in a replication controller, deployment, replica set or stateful set based on observed CPU or memory utilization. Created only if the user setshorizontalPodAutoscaler.enabled = true
.PodDisruptionBudget
: ThePodDisruptionBudget
resource that specifies a disruption budget for thePods
managed by theDeployment
. This manages how many pods can be disrupted by a voluntary disruption (e.g node maintenance). Created if you specify a non-zero value for theminPodsAvailable
input value.ManagedCertificate
: TheManagedCertificate
is a GCP -specific resource that creates a Google Managed SSL certificate. Google-managed SSL certificates are provisioned, renewed, and managed for your domain names. Read more about Google-managed SSL certificates here. Created only if you configure thegoogle.managedCertificate
input (and setgoogle.managedCertificate.enabled = true
andgoogle.managedCertificate.domainName = your.domain.name
).
back to root README
You can create custom Kubernetes resources, that are not directly managed by the chart, within the customResources
key. You provide each resource manifest directly as a value under customResources.resources
and set
customResources.enabled
to true
. For examples of custom resources, take a look at the examples in
test/fixtures/custom_resources_values.yaml and
test/fixtures/multiple_custom_resources_values.yaml.
back to root README
In general, Pods
are considered ephemeral in Kubernetes. Pods
can come and go at any point in time, either because
containers fail or the underlying instances crash. In either case, the dynamic nature of Pods
make it difficult to
consistently access your application if you are individually addressing the Pods
directly.
Traditionally, this is solved using service discovery, where you have a stateful system that the Pods
would register
to when they are available. Then, your other applications can query the system to find all the available Pods
and
access one of the available ones.
Kubernetes provides a built in mechanism for service discovery in the Service
resource. Services
are an abstraction
that groups a set of Pods
behind a consistent, stable endpoint to address them. By creating a Service
resource, you
can provide a single endpoint to other applications to connect to the Pods
behind the Service
, and not worry about
the dynamic nature of the Pods
.
You can read a more detailed description of Services
in the official
documentation. Here we will cover just enough to
understand how to access your app.
By default, this Helm Chart will deploy your application container in a Pod
that exposes ports 80. These will
be exposed to the Kubernetes cluster behind the Service
resource, which exposes port 80. You can modify this behavior
by overriding the containerPorts
input value and the service
input value. See the corresponding section in the
values.yaml
file for more details.
Once the Service
is created, you can check what endpoint the Service
provides by querying Kubernetes using
kubectl
. First, retrieve the Service
name that is outputted in the install summary when you first install the Helm
Chart. If you forget, you can get the same information at a later point using helm status
. For example, if you had
previously installed this chart under the name edge-service
, you can run the following command to see the created
resources:
$ helm status edge-service
LAST DEPLOYED: Fri Feb 8 16:25:49 2019
NAMESPACE: default
STATUS: DEPLOYED
RESOURCES:
==> v1/Service
NAME AGE
edge-service-nginx 24m
==> v1/Deployment
edge-service-nginx 24m
==> v1/Pod(related)
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-f5wc4 1/1 Running 0 24m
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-mln26 1/1 Running 0 24m
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-rdsr8 1/1 Running 0 24m
This will show you some metadata about the release, the deployed resources, and any notes provided by the Helm Chart. In
this example, the service name is edge-service-nginx
so we will use that to query the Service
:
$ kubectl get service edge-service-nginx
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
edge-service-nginx ClusterIP 172.20.186.176 <none> 80/TCP 27m
Here you can see basic information about the Service
. The important piece of information is the CLUSTER-IP
and
PORT
fields, which tell you the available endpoint for the Service
, and any exposed ports. Given that, any Pod
in
your Kubernetes cluster can access the Pods
of this application by hitting {CLUSTER-IP}:{PORT}
. So for this example,
that will be 172.20.186.176:80
.
But what if you want to automatically find a Service
by name? The name of the Service
created by this Helm Chart is
always {RELEASE_NAME}-{applicationName}
, where applicationName
is provided in the input value and RELEASE_NAME
is
set when you install the Helm Chart. This means that the name is predictable, while the allocated IP address may not be.
To address the Service
by name, Kubernetes provides two ways:
- environment variables
- DNS
For each active Service
that a Pod
has access to, Kubernetes will automatically set a set of environment variables
in the container. These are {SVCNAME}_SERVICE_HOST
and {SVCNAME}_SERVICE_PORT
to get the host address (ip address)
and port respectively, where SVCNAME
is the name of the Service
. Note that SVCNAME
will be the all caps version
with underscores of the Service
name.
Using the previous example where we installed this chart with a release name edge-service
and applicationName
nginx
, we get the Service
name edge-service-nginx
. Kubernetes will expose the following environment variables to
all containers that can access the Service
:
EDGE_SERVICE_NGINX_SERVICE_HOST=172.20.186.176
EDGE_SERVICE_NGINX_SERVICE_PORT=80
Note that environment variables are set when the container first boots up. This means that if you already had Pods
deployed in your system before the Service
was created, you will have to cycle the Pods
in order to get the
environment variables. If you wish to avoid ordering issues, you can use the DNS method to address the Service
instead, if that is available.
If your Kubernetes cluster is deployed with the DNS add-on (this is automatically installed for EKS and GKE), then you
can rely on DNS to address your Service
. Every Service
in Kubernetes will register the domain
{SVCNAME}.{NAMESPACE}.svc.cluster.local
to the DNS service of the cluster. This means that all your Pods
in the
cluster can get the Service
host by hitting that domain.
The NAMESPACE
in the domain refers to the Namespace
where the Service
was created. By default, all resources are
created in the default
namespace. This is configurable at install time of the Helm Chart using the --namespace
option.
In our example, we deployed the chart to the default
Namespace
, and the Service
name is edge-service-nginx
. So in
this case, the domain of the Service
will be edge-service-nginx.default.svc.cluster.local
. When any Pod
addresses
that domain, it will get the address 172.20.186.176
.
Note that DNS does not resolve ports, so in this case, you will have to know which port the Service
uses. So in your
Pod
, you will have to know that the Service
exposes port 80
when you address it in your code for the container as
edge-service-nginx.default.svc.cluster.local:80
. However, like the Service
name, this should be predictable since it
is specified in the Helm Chart input value.
back to root README
Similar to the previous section (How do I expose my application internally to the
cluster?, you can use a Service
resource to expose your
application externally. The primary service type that facilitates external access is the NodePort
Service
type.
The NodePort
Service
type will expose the Service
by binding an available port on the network interface of the
physical machines running the Pod
. This is different from a network interface internal to Kubernetes, which is only
accessible within the cluster. Since the port is on the host machine network interface, you can access the Service
by
hitting that port on the node.
For example, suppose you had a 2 node Kubernetes cluster deployed on EC2. Suppose further that all your EC2 instances have public IP addresses that you can access. For the sake of this example, we will assign random IP addresses to the instances:
- 54.219.117.250
- 38.110.235.198
Now let's assume you deployed this helm chart using the NodePort
Service
type. You can do this by setting the
service.type
input value to NodePort
:
service:
enabled: true
type: NodePort
ports:
app:
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
When you install this helm chart with this input config, helm will deploy the Service
as a NodePort
, binding an
available port on the host machine to access the Service
. You can confirm this by querying the Service
using
kubectl
:
$ kubectl get service edge-service-nginx
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
edge-service-nginx NodePort 10.99.244.96 <none> 80:31035/TCP 33s
In this example, you can see that the Service
type is NodePort
as expected. Additionally, you can see that the there
is a port binding between port 80 and 31035. This port binding refers to the binding between the Service
port (80 in
this case) and the host port (31035 in this case).
One thing to be aware of about NodePorts
is that the port binding will exist on all nodes in the cluster. This means
that, in our 2 node example, both nodes now have a port binding of 31035 on the host network interface that routes to
the Service
, regardless of whether or not the node is running the Pods
backing the Service
endpoint. This means
that you can reach the Service
on both of the following endpoints:
54.219.117.250:31035
38.110.235.198:31035
This means that no two Service
can share the same NodePort
, as the port binding is shared across the cluster.
Additionally, if you happen to hit a node that is not running a Pod
backing the Service
, Kubernetes will
automatically hop to one that is.
You might use the NodePort
if you do not wish to manage load balancers through Kubernetes, or if you are running
Kubernetes on prem where you do not have native support for managed load balancers.
To summarize:
NodePort
is the simplest way to expose yourService
to externally to the cluster.- You have a limit on the number of
NodePort
Services
you can have in your cluster, imposed by the number of open ports available on your host machines. - You have potentially inefficient hopping if you happen to route to a node that is not running the
Pod
backing theService
.
Additionally, Kubernetes provides two mechanisms to manage an external load balancer that routes to the NodePort
for
you. The two ways are:
The LoadBalancer
Service
type will expose the Service
by allocating a managed load balancer in the cloud that is
hosting the Kubernetes cluster. On AWS, this will be an ELB, while on GCP, this will be a Cloud Load Balancer. When the
LoadBalancer
Service
is created, Kubernetes will automatically create the underlying load balancer resource in the
cloud for you, and create all the target groups so that they route to the Pods
backing the Service
.
You can deploy this helm chart using the LoadBalancer
Service
type by setting the service.type
input value to
LoadBalancer
:
service:
enabled: true
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
app:
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
When you install this helm chart with this input config, helm will deploy the Service
as a LoadBalancer
, allocating
a managed load balancer in the cloud hosting your Kubernetes cluster. You can get the attached load balancer by querying
the Service
using kubectl
. In this example, we will assume we are using EKS:
$ kubectl get service edge-service-nginx
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
edge-service-nginx LoadBalancer 172.20.7.35 a02fef4d02e41... 80:32127/TCP 1m
Now, in this example, we have an entry in the EXTERNAL-IP
field. This is truncated here, but you can get the actual
output when you describe the service:
$ kubectl describe service edge-service-nginx
Name: edge-service-nginx
Namespace: default
Labels: app.kubernetes.io/instance=edge-service
app.kubernetes.io/managed-by=helm
app.kubernetes.io/name=nginx
gruntwork.io/app-name=nginx
helm.sh/chart=k8s-service-0.1.0
Annotations: <none>
Selector: app.kubernetes.io/instance=edge-service,app.kubernetes.io/name=nginx,gruntwork.io/app-name=nginx
Type: LoadBalancer
IP: 172.20.7.35
LoadBalancer Ingress: a02fef4d02e4111e9891806271fc7470-173030870.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com
Port: app 80/TCP
TargetPort: 80/TCP
NodePort: app 32127/TCP
Endpoints: 10.0.3.19:80
Session Affinity: None
External Traffic Policy: Cluster
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal EnsuringLoadBalancer 2m service-controller Ensuring load balancer
Normal EnsuredLoadBalancer 2m service-controller Ensured load balancer
In the describe output, there is a field named LoadBalancer Ingress
. When you have a LoadBalancer
Service
type,
this field contains the public DNS endpoint of the associated load balancer resource in the cloud provider. In this
case, we have an AWS ELB instance, so this endpoint is the public endpoint of the associated ELB resource.
Note: Eagle eyed readers might also notice that there is an associated NodePort
on the resource. This is because under the
hood, LoadBalancer
Services
utilize NodePorts
to handle the connection between the managed load balancer of the
cloud provider and the Kubernetes Pods
. This is because at this time, there is no portable way to ensure that the
network between the cloud load balancers and Kubernetes can be shared such that the load balancers can route to the
internal network of the Kubernetes cluster. Therefore, Kubernetes resorts to using NodePort
as an abstraction layer to
connect the LoadBalancer
to the Pods
backing the Service
. This means that LoadBalancer
Services
share the same
drawbacks as using a NodePort
Service
.
To summarize:
LoadBalancer
provides a way to set up a cloud load balancer resource that routes to the provisionedNodePort
on each node in your Kubernetes cluster.LoadBalancer
can be used to provide a persistent endpoint that is robust to the ephemeral nature of nodes in your cluster. E.g it is able to route to live nodes in the face of node failures.LoadBalancer
does not support weighted balancing. This means that you cannot balance the traffic so that it prefers nodes that have more instances of thePod
running.- Note that under the hood,
LoadBalancer
utilizes aNodePort
Service
, and thus shares the same limits asNodePort
.
Ingress
is a mechanism in Kubernetes that abstracts externally exposing a Service
from the Service
config itself.
Ingress
resources support:
- assigning an externally accessible URL to a
Service
- perform hostname and path based routing of
Services
- load balance traffic using customizable balancing rules
- terminate SSL
You can read more about Ingress
resources in the official
documentation. Here, we will cover the basics to
understand how Ingress
can be used to externally expose the Service
.
At a high level, the Ingress
resource is used to specify the configuration for a particular Service
. In turn, the
Ingress Controller
is responsible for fulfilling those configurations in the cluster. This means that the first
decision to make in using Ingress
resources, is selecting an appropriate Ingress Controller
for your cluster.
Before you can use an Ingress
resource, you must install an Ingress Controller
in your Kubernetes cluster. There are
many kinds of Ingress Controllers
available, each with different properties. You can see a few examples listed in the
official documentation.
When you use an external cloud Ingress Controller
such as the GCE Ingress
Controller or AWS ALB Ingress
Controller, Kubernetes will allocate an externally
addressable load balancer (for GCE this will be a Cloud Load Balancer and for AWS this will be an ALB) that fulfills the
Ingress
rules. This includes routing the domain names and paths to the right Service
as configured by the Ingress
rules. Additionally, Kubernetes will manage the target groups of the load balancer so that they are up to date with
the latest Ingress
configuration. However, in order for this to work, there needs to be some way for the load balancer
to connect to the Pods
servicing the Service
. Since the Pods
are internal to the Kubernetes network and the load
balancers are external to the network, there must be a NodePort
that links the two together. As such, like the
LoadBalancer
Service
type, these Ingress Controllers
also require a NodePort
under the hood.
Alternatively, you can use an internal Ingress Controller
that runs within Kubernetes as Pods
. For example, the
official nginx Ingress Controller
will launch nginx
as Pods
within your Kubernetes cluster. These nginx
Pods
are then configured using Ingress
resources, which then allows nginx
to route to the right Pods
. Since the nginx
Pods
are internal to the Kubernetes network, there is no need for your Services
to be NodePorts
as they are
addressable within the network by the Pods
. However, this means that you need some other mechanism to expose nginx
to the outside world, which will require a NodePort
. The advantage of this approach, despite still requiring a
NodePort
, is that you can have a single NodePort
that routes to multiple services using hostnames or paths as
managed by nginx
, as opposed to requiring a NodePort
per Service
you wish to expose.
Which Ingress Controller
type you wish to use depends on your infrastructure needs. If you have relatively few
Services
, and you want the simplicity of a managed cloud load balancer experience, you might opt for the external
Ingress Controllers
such as GCE and AWS ALB controllers. On the other hand, if you have thousands of micro services
that push you to the limits of the available number of ports on a host machine, you might opt for an internal Ingress Controller
approach. Whichever approach you decide, be sure to document your decision where you install the particular
Ingress Controller
so that others in your team know and understand the tradeoffs you made.
Once you have an Ingress Controller
installed and configured on your Kuberentes cluster, you can now start creating
Ingress
resources to add routes to it. This helm chart supports configuring an Ingress
resource to complement the
Service
resource that is created in the chart.
To add an Ingress
resource, first make sure you have a Service
enabled on the chart. Depending on the chosen
Ingress Controller
, the Service
type should be NodePort
or ClusterIP
. Here, we will create a NodePort
Service
exposing port 80:
service:
enabled: true
type: NodePort
ports:
app:
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
Then, we will add the configuration for the Ingress
resource by specifying the ingress
input value. For this
example, we will assume that we want to route /app
to our Service
, with the domain hosted on app.yourco.com
:
ingress:
enabled: true
path: /app
servicePort: 80
hosts:
- app.yourco.com
This will configure the load balancer backing the Ingress Controller
that will route any traffic with host and path
prefix app.yourco.com/app
to the Service
on port 80. If app.yourco.com
is configured to point to the Ingress Controller
load balancer, then once you deploy the helm chart you should be able to start accessing your app on that
endpoint.
Sometimes you might want to add additional path rules beyond the main service rule that is injected to the Ingress
resource. For example, you might want a path that routes to the sidecar containers, or you might want to reuse a single
Ingress
for multiple different Service
endpoints because to share load balancers. For these situations, you can use
the additionalPaths
and additionalPathsHigherPriority
input values.
Consider the following Service
, where we have the app
served on port 80, and the sidecarMonitor
served on port
3000:
service:
enabled: true
type: NodePort
ports:
app:
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
sidecarMonitor:
port: 3000
targetPort: 3000
protocol: TCP
To route /app
to the app
service endpoint and /sidecar
to the sidecarMonitor
service endpoint, we will configure
the app
service path rules as the main service route and the sidecarMonitor
as an additional path rule:
ingress:
enabled: true
path: /app
servicePort: 80
additionalPaths:
- path: /sidecar
servicePort: 3000
Now suppose you had a sidecar service that will return a fixed response indicating server maintainance and you want to
temporarily route all requests to that endpoint without taking down the pod. You can do this by creating a route that
catches all paths as a higher priority path using the additionalPathsHigherPriority
input value.
Consider the following Service
, where we have the app
served on port 80, and the sidecarFixedResponse
served on
port 3000:
service:
enabled: true
type: NodePort
ports:
app:
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
sidecarFixedResponse:
port: 3000
targetPort: 3000
protocol: TCP
To route all traffic to the fixed response port:
ingress:
enabled: true
path: /app
servicePort: 80
additionalPathsHigherPriority:
- path: /*
servicePort: 3000
The /*
rule which routes to port 3000 will always be used even when accessing the path /app
because it will be
evaluated first when routing requests.
back to root README
By default, this Helm Chart will deploy your application container in a Pod that exposes ports 80. Sometimes you might
want to expose additional ports in your application - for example a separate port for Prometheus metrics. You can expose
additional ports for your application by overriding containerPorts
and service
input values:
containerPorts:
http:
port: 80
protocol: TCP
prometheus:
port: 2020
protocol: TCP
service:
enabled: true
type: NodePort
ports:
app:
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
prometheus:
port: 2020
targetPort: 2020
protocol: TCP
Worker services typically do not have a RPC or web server interface to access it. Instead, worker services act on their
own and typically reach out to get the data they need. These services should be deployed without any ports exposed.
However, by default k8s-service
will deploy an internally exposed service with port 80 open.
To disable the default port, you can use the following values.yaml
inputs:
containerPorts:
http:
disabled: true
service:
enabled: false
This will override the default settings such that only the Deployment
resource is created, with no ports exposed on
the container.
back to root README
This Helm Chart packages your application into a Deployment
controller. The Deployment
controller will be
responsible with managing the Pods
of your application, ensuring that the Kubernetes cluster matches the desired state
configured by the chart inputs.
When the Helm Chart installs, helm
will mark the installation as successful when the resources are created. Under the
hood, the Deployment
controller will do the work towards ensuring the desired number of Pods
are up and running.
For example, suppose you set the replicaCount
variable to 3 when installing this chart. This will configure the
Deployment
resource to maintain 3 replicas of the Pod
at any given time, launching new ones if there is a deficit or
removing old ones if there is a surplus.
To see the current status of the Deployment
, you can query Kubernetes using kubectl
. The Deployment
resource of
the chart are labeled with the applicationName
input value and the release name provided by helm. So for example,
suppose you deployed this chart using the following values.yaml
file and command:
applicationName: nginx
containerImage:
repository: nginx
tag: stable
$ helm install -n edge-service gruntwork/k8s-service
In this example, the applicationName
is set to nginx
, while the release name is set to edge-service
. This chart
will then install a Deployment
resource in the default Namespace
with the following labels that uniquely identifies
it:
app.kubernetes.io/name: nginx
app.kubernetes.io/instance: edge-service
So now you can query Kubernetes for that Deployment
resource using these labels to see the state:
$ kubectl get deployments -l "app.kubernetes.io/name=nginx,app.kubernetes.io/instance=edge-service"
NAME DESIRED CURRENT UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
edge-service-nginx 3 3 3 1 24s
This includes a few useful information:
DESIRED
lists the number ofPods
that should be running in your cluster.CURRENT
lists how manyPods
are currently created in the cluster.UP-TO-DATE
lists how manyPods
are running the desired image.AVAILABLE
lists how manyPods
are currently ready to serve traffic, as defined by thereadinessProbe
.
When all the numbers are in sync and equal, that means the Deployment
was rolled out successfully and all the Pods
are passing the readiness healthchecks.
In the example output above, note how the Available
count is 1
, but the others are 3
. This means that all 3 Pods
were successfully created with the latest image, but only 1
of them successfully came up. You can dig deeper into the
individual Pods
to check the status of the unavailable Pods
. The Pods
are labeled the same way, so you can pass in
the same label query to get the Pods
managed by the deployment:
$ kubectl get pods -l "app.kubernetes.io/name=nginx,app.kubernetes.io/instance=edge-service"
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-f5wc4 1/1 Running 0 52s
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-mln26 0/1 Pending 0 52s
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-rdsr8 0/1 Pending 0 52s
This will show you the status of each individual Pod
in your deployment. In this example output, there are 2 Pods
that are in the Pending
status, meaning that they have not been scheduled yet. We can look into why the Pod
failed
to schedule by getting detailed information about the Pod
with the describe
command. Unlike get pods
, describe pod
requires a single Pod
so we will grab the name of one of the failing Pods
above and feed it to describe pod
:
$ kubectl describe pod edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-mln26
Name: edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-mln26
Namespace: default
Priority: 0
PriorityClassName: <none>
Node: <none>
Labels: app.kubernetes.io/instance=edge-service
app.kubernetes.io/name=nginx
gruntwork.io/app-name=nginx
pod-template-hash=4007534893
Annotations: <none>
Status: Pending
IP:
Controlled By: ReplicaSet/edge-service-nginx-844c978df7
Containers:
nginx:
Image: nginx:stable
Ports: 80/TCP
Host Ports: 0/TCP
Environment: <none>
Mounts:
/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from default-token-mgkr9 (ro)
Conditions:
Type Status
PodScheduled False
Volumes:
default-token-mgkr9:
Type: Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
SecretName: default-token-mgkr9
Optional: false
QoS Class: BestEffort
Node-Selectors: <none>
Tolerations: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute for 300s
node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute for 300s
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Warning FailedScheduling 1m (x25 over 3m) default-scheduler 0/2 nodes are available: 2 Insufficient pods.
This will output detailed information about the Pod
, including an event log. In this case, the roll out failed because
there is not enough capacity in the cluster to schedule the Pod
.
back to root README
While you can bake most application configuration values into the application container, you might need to inject dynamic configuration variables into the container. These are typically values that change depending on the environment, such as the MySQL database endpoint. Additionally, you might also want a way to securely share secrets with the container such that they are not hard coded in plain text in the container or in the Helm Chart values yaml file. To support these use cases, this Helm Chart provides three ways to share configuration values with the application container:
The simplest way to set a configuration value for the container is to set an environment variable for the container runtime. These variables are set by Kubernetes before the container application is booted, which can then be looked up using the standard OS lookup functions for environment variables.
You can use the envVars
input value to set an environment variable at deploy time. For example, the following entry in
a values.yaml
file will set the DB_HOST
environment variable to mysql.default.svc.cluster.local
and the DB_PORT
environment variable to 3306
:
envVars:
DB_HOST: "mysql.default.svc.cluster.local"
DB_PORT: 3306
One thing to be aware of when using environment variables is that they are set at start time of the container. This means that updating the environment variables require restarting the containers so that they propagate.
While environment variables are an easy way to inject configuration values, what if you want to share the configuration across multiple deployments? If you wish to use the direct environment variables approach, you would have no choice but to copy paste the values across each deployment. When this value needs to change, you are now faced with going through each deployment and updating the reference.
For this situation, ConfigMaps
would be a better option. ConfigMaps
help decouple configuration values from the
Deployment
and Pod
config, allowing you to share the values across the deployments. ConfigMaps
are dedicated
resources in Kubernetes that store configuration values as key value pairs.
For example, suppose you had a ConfigMap
to store the database information. You might store the information as two key
value pairs: one for the host (dbhost
) and one for the port (dbport
). You can create a ConfigMap
directly using
kubectl
, or by using a resource file.
To directly create the ConfigMap
:
kubectl create configmap my-config --from-literal=dbhost=mysql.default.svc.cluster.local --from-literal=dbport=3306
Alternatively, you can manage the ConfigMap
as code using a kubernetes resource config:
# my-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: my-config
data:
dbhost: mysql.default.svc.cluster.local
dbport: 3306
You can then apply this resource file using kubectl
:
kubectl apply -f my-config.yaml
kubectl
supports multiple ways to seed the ConfigMap
. You can read all the different ways to create a ConfigMap
in
the official
documentation.
Once the ConfigMap
is created, you can access the ConfigMap
within the Pod
by configuring the access during
deployment. This Helm Chart provides the configMaps
input value to configure what ConfigMaps
should be shared with
the application container. There are two ways to inject the ConfigMap
:
NOTE: It is generally not recommended to use ConfigMaps
to store sensitive data. For those use cases, use
Secrets
or an external secret store.
You can set the values of the ConfigMap
as environment variables in the application container. To do so, you set the
as
attribute of the configMaps
input value to environment
. For example, to share the my-config
ConfigMap
above
using the same environment variables as the example in Directly setting environment
variables, you would set the configMaps
as follows:
configMaps:
my-config:
as: environment
items:
dbhost:
envVarName: DB_HOST
dbport:
envVarName: DB_PORT
In this configuration for the Helm Chart, we specify that we want to share the my-config
ConfigMap
as environment
variables with the main application container. Additionally, we want to map the dbhost
config value to the DB_HOST
environment variable, and similarly map the dbport
config value to the DB_PORT
environment variable.
Note that like directly setting environment variables, these are set at container start time, and thus the containers
need to be restarted when the ConfigMap
is updated for the new values to be propagated. You can use files instead if
you wish the ConfigMap
changes to propagate immediately.
You can mount the ConfigMap
values as files on the container filesystem. To do so, you set the as
attribute of the
configMaps
input value to volume
.
For example, suppose you wanted to share the my-config
ConfigMap
above as the files /etc/db/host
and
/etc/db/port
. For this case, you would set the configMaps
input value to:
configMaps:
my-config:
as: volume
mountPath: /etc/db
items:
dbhost:
filePath: host
dbport:
filePath: port
In the container, now the values for dbhost
is stored as a text file at the path /etc/db/host
and dbport
is stored
at the path /etc/db/port
. You can then read these files in in your application to get the values.
Unlike environment variables, using files has the advantage of immediately reflecting changes to the ConfigMap
. For
example, when you update my-config
, the files at /etc/db
are updated automatically with the new values, without
needing a redeployment to propagate the new values to the container.
In general, it is discouraged to store sensitive information such as passwords in ConfigMaps
. Instead, Kubernetes
provides Secrets
as an alternative resource to store sensitive data. Similar to ConfigMaps
, Secrets
are key value
pairs that store configuration values that can be managed independently of the Pod
and containers. However, unlike
ConfigMaps
, Secrets
have the following properties:
- A secret is only sent to a node if a pod on that node requires it. They are automatically garbage collected when there
are no more
Pods
referencing it on the node. - A secret is stored in
tmpfs
on the node, so that it is only available in memory. - Starting with Kubernetes 1.7, they can be encrypted at rest in
etcd
(note: this feature was in alpha state until Kubernetes 1.13).
You can read more about the protections and risks of using Secrets
in the official
documentation.
Creating a Secret
is very similar to creating a ConfigMap
. For example, suppose you had a Secret
to store the
database password. Like ConfigMaps
, you can create a Secret
directly using kubectl
:
kubectl create secret generic my-secret --from-literal=password=1f2d1e2e67df
The generic
keyword indicates the Secret
type. Almost all use cases for your application should use this type. Other
types include docker-registry
for specifying credentials for accessing a private docker registry, and tls
for
specifying TLS certificates to access the Kubernetes API.
You can also manage the Secret
as code, although you may want to avoid this for Secrets
to avoid leaking them in
unexpected locations (e.g source control). Unlike ConfigMaps
, Secrets
require values to be stored as base64 encoded
values when using resource files. So the configuration for the above example will be:
# my-secret.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
type: Opaque
metadata:
name: my-secret
data:
password: MWYyZDFlMmU2N2Rm
Note that MWYyZDFlMmU2N2Rm
is the base 64 encoded version of 1f2d1e2e67df
. You can then apply this resource config
using kubectl
:
kubectl apply -f my-secret.yaml
Similar to ConfigMaps
, this Helm Chart supports two ways to inject Secrets
into the application container: as
environment variables, or as files. The syntax to share the values is very similar to the configMaps
input value, only
you use the secrets
input value. The properties of each approach is very similar to ConfigMaps
. Refer to the
previous section for more details on each approach. Here, we show you examples of the input values
to use for each approach.
Mounting secrets as environment variables: In this example, we mount the my-secret
Secret
created above as the
environment variable DB_PASSWORD
.
secrets:
my-secret:
as: environment
items:
password:
envVarName: DB_PASSWORD
Mounting secrets as files: In this example, we mount the my-secret
Secret
as the file /etc/db/password
.
secrets:
my-secret:
as: volume
mountPath: /etc/db
items:
password:
filePath: password
Mounting secrets with CSI: In this example, we mount the my-secret
Secret
as the file /etc/db
, and specify that the secret will sync with Secret Manager store (AWS, GCP, Vault) secret named my-secret
. We also details the csi block were we define the driver and secreteProviderClass.
secrets:
my-secret:
as: csi
mountPath: /etc/db
readOnly: true
csi:
driver: secrets-store.csi.k8s.io
secretProviderClass: secret-provider-class
items:
my-secret:
envVarName: SECRET_VAR
NOTE: The volumes are different between secrets
and configMaps
. This means that if you use the same mountPath
for different secrets and config maps, you can end up with only one. It is undefined which Secret
or ConfigMap
ends
up getting mounted. To be safe, use a different mountPath
for each one.
NOTE: If you want mount the volumes created with secrets
or configMaps
on your init or sidecar containers, you will
have to append -volume
to the volume name in . In the example above, the resulting volume will be my-secret-volume
.
Note When installing the CSI driver on your cluster you have an option to activate syncing of secrets
sideCarContainers:
sidecar:
image: sidecar/container:latest
volumeMounts:
- name: my-secret-volume
mountPath: /etc/db
Which configuration method you should use depends on your needs. Here is a summary of the pro and con of each approach:
Pro:
- Simple setup
- Manage configuration values directly with application deployment config
- Most application languages support looking up environment variables
Con:
- Tightly couple configuration settings with application deployment
- Requires redeployment to update values
- Must store in plain text, and easy to leak into VCS
Best for:
- Iterating different configuration values during development
- Sotring non-sensitive values that are unique to each environment / deployment
Pro:
- Keep config DRY by sharing a common set of configurations
- Independently update config values from the application deployment
- Automatically propagate new values when stored as files
Con:
- More overhead to manage the configuration
- Stored in plain text
- Available on all nodes automatically
Best for:
- Storing non-sensitive common configuration that are shared across environments
- Storing non-sensitive dynamic configuration values that change frequently
Pro:
- All the benefits of using
ConfigMaps
- Can be encrypted at rest
- Opaque by default when viewing the values (harder to remember base 64 encoded version of "admin")
- Only available to nodes that use it, and only in memory
Con:
- All the challenges of using
ConfigMaps
- Configured in plain text, making it difficult to manage as code securely
- Less safe than using dedicated secrets manager / store like HashiCorp Vault.
Best for:
- Storing sensitive configuration values
back to root README
To update the application to a new version, you can upgrade the Helm Release using updated values. For example, suppose
you deployed nginx
version 1.15.4 using this Helm Chart with the following values:
containerImage:
repository: nginx
tag: 1.15.4
applicationName: nginx
In this example, we will further assume that you deployed this chart with the above values using the release name
edge-service
, using a command similar to below:
$ helm install -f values.yaml --name edge-service gruntwork/k8s-service
Now let's try upgrading nginx
to version 1.15.8. To do so, we will first update our values file:
containerImage:
repository: nginx
tag: 1.15.8
applicationName: nginx
The only difference here is the tag
of the containerImage
.
Next, we will upgrade our release using the updated values. To do so, we will use the helm upgrade
command:
$ helm upgrade -f values.yaml edge-service gruntwork/k8s-service
This will update the created resources with the new values provided by the updated values.yaml
file. For this example,
the only resource that will be updated is the Deployment
resource, which will now have a new Pod
spec that points to
nginx:1.15.8
as opposed to nginx:1.15.4
. This automatically triggers a rolling deployment internally to Kubernetes,
which will launch new Pods
using the latest image, and shut down old Pods
once those are ready.
You can read more about how changes are rolled out on Deployment
resources in the official
documentation.
Note that certain changes will lead to a replacement of the Deployment
resource. For example, updating the
applicationName
will cause the Deployment
resource to be deleted, and then created. This can lead to down time
because the resources are replaced in an uncontrolled fashion.
You may optionally configure a canary deployment of an arbitrary tag that will run as an individual deployment behind your configured service. This is useful for ensuring a new application tag runs without issues prior to fully rolling it out.
To configure a canary deployment, set canary.enabled = true
and define the containerImage
values. Typically, you will want to specify the tag of your next release candidate:
canary:
enabled: true
containerImage:
repository: nginx
tag: 1.15.9
Once deployed, your service will route traffic across both your stable and canary deployments, allowing you to monitor for and catch any issues early.
back to root README
Canary deployment pods have the same name as your stable deployment pods, with the additional -canary
appended to the end, like so:
$ kubectl get pods -l "app.kubernetes.io/name=nginx,app.kubernetes.io/instance=edge-service"
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-f5wc4 1/1 Running 0 52s
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-mln26 0/1 Pending 0 52s
edge-service-nginx-844c978df7-rdsr8 0/1 Pending 0 52s
edge-service-nginx-canary-844c978df7-bsr8 0/1 Pending 0 52s
Therefore, in this example, you could monitor your canary by running kubectl logs -f edge-service-nginx-canary-844c978df7-bsr8
back to root README
Update your values.yaml file, setting canary.enabled = false
and then upgrade your helm installation:
$ helm upgrade -f values.yaml edge-service gruntwork/k8s-service
Following this update, Kubernetes will determine that your canary deployment is no longer desired and will delete it.
back to root README
Sometimes, you may want to ensure that a specific number of Pods
are always available during voluntary
maintenance.
This chart exposes an input value minPodsAvailable
that can be used to specify a minimum number of Pods
to maintain
during a voluntary maintenance activity. Under the hood, this chart will create a corresponding PodDisruptionBudget
to
ensure that a certain number of Pods
are up before attempting to terminate additional ones.
You can read more about PodDisruptionBudgets
in our blog post covering the
topic
and in the official
documentation.
back to root README
When a Pod
is removed from a Kubernetes cluster, the control plane notifies all nodes to remove the Pod
from
registered addresses. This includes removing the Pod
from the list of available Pods
to service a Service
endpoint. However, because Kubernetes is a distributed system, there is a delay between the shutdown sequence and the
Pod
being removed from available addresses. As a result, the Pod
could still get traffic despite it having already
been shutdown on the node it was running on.
Since there is no way to guarantee that the deletion has propagated across the cluster, we address this eventual
consistency issue by adding an arbitrary delay between the Pod
being deleted and the initiation of the Pod
shutdown
sequence. This is accomplished by adding a sleep
command in the preStop
hook.
You can control the length of time to delay with the shutdownDelay
input value. You can also disable this behavior by
setting the shutdownDelay
to 0.
You can read more about this topic in our blog post "Delaying Shutdown to Wait for Pod Deletion Propagation".
back to root README
In Kubernetes, Pods
are one or more tightly coupled containers that are deployed together. The containers in the Pod
share, amongst other things, the network stack, the IPC namespace, and in some cases the PID namespace. You can read
more about the resources that the containers in a Pod
share in the official
documentation.
Sidecar Containers are additional containers that you wish to deploy in the Pod
housing your application container.
This helm chart supports deploying these containers by configuring the sideCarContainers
input value. This input value
is a map between the side car container name and the values of the container spec. The spec is rendered directly into
the Deployment
resource, with the name
being set to the key. For example:
sideCarContainers:
datadog:
image: datadog/agent:latest
env:
- name: DD_API_KEY
value: ASDF-1234
- name: SD_BACKEND
value: docker
nginx:
image: nginx:1.15.4
This input will be rendered in the Deployment
resource as:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
... Snipped for brevity ...
spec:
... Snipped for brevity ...
template:
spec:
containers:
... The first entry relates to the application ...
- name: datadog
image: datadog/agent:latest
env:
- name: DD_API_KEY
value: ASDF-1234
- name: SD_BACKEND
value: docker
- name: nginx
image: nginx:1.15.4
In this config, the side car containers are rendered as additional containers to deploy alongside the main application
container configured by the containerImage
, ports
, livenessProbe
, etc input values. Note that the
sideCarContainers
variable directly renders the spec, meaning that the additional values for the side cars such as
livenessProbe
should be rendered directly within the sideCarContainers
input value.
back to root README
To pull container images from a private registry, the Kubernetes cluster needs to be able to authenticate to the docker registry with a registry key. On managed Kubernetes clusters (e.g EKS, GKE, AKS), this is automated through the server IAM roles that are assigned to the instance VMs. In most cases, if the instance VM IAM role has the permissions to access the registry, the Kubernetes cluster will automatically be able to pull down images from the respective managed registry (e.g ECR on EKS or GCR on GKE).
Alternatively, you can specify docker registry keys in the Kubernetes cluster as Secret
resources. This is helpful in
situations where you do not have the ability to assign registry access IAM roles to the node itself, or if you are
pulling images off of a different registry (e.g accessing GCR from EKS cluster).
You can use kubectl
to create a Secret
in Kubernetes that can be used as a docker registry key:
kubectl create secret docker-registry NAME \
--docker-server=DOCKER_REGISTRY_SERVER \
--docker-username=DOCKER_USER \
--docker-password=DOCKER_PASSWORD \
--docker-email=DOCKER_EMAIL
This command will create a Secret
resource named NAME
that holds the specified docker registry credentials. You can
then specify the cluster to use this Secret
when pulling down images for the service Deployment
in this chart by
using the imagePullSecrets
input value:
imagePullSecrets:
- NAME
You can learn more about using private registries with Kubernetes in the official documentation.
back to root README