-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The test result(megaface rankn and roc) of Circle loss is so bad. #42
Comments
I trained r100 with circle loss. how about val dataset acc ? |
the training acc is always stay 0.001 like below, so strange. But the val eval looks good(lower than arcface loss). |
The training parameters is default. At first, i wonder if it is too little training iterations. But the circle loss paper is only 182k iterations. less than 24epoch. So it seems like my wonder is wrong. |
your LOSS_NAME is softmax or softplus? |
softplus. |
what's the megaface and ijbc acc ? |
how to look at the megaface acc? I only use the cmc_json which generated under the megaface_24 file. and generate the cmc curve. the rank1 is too low. |
|
the eval program will generate embeddings and otherfiles, and remove embeddings and otherfiles when finish evaluation. the result is appended in service/face.result file |
hello, Has the problem been solved? |
The test result(megaface rankn and roc) of Circle loss is so bad. I trained it by efficient-b0. but when I test it on megaface. the result is so bad. Do you ever trained it? if yes. can you provice the pretrained model? ths
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: