You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thinking about how we make a distinction between the time period of the dataset (e.g. 30 year climate periods) and the time period of the variation of the variable relative to the background state.
The documentation for the snow indicators uses the term "time horizon" for the longer term time periods.
Time Horizon:
Recent past (1986-2005)
Near Future (2021-2040)
Mid Century (2041 – 2060)
End of Century (2081- 2100)
If we adopt the same wording we can then refer to the time period of the monthly/season/annual variable as a "time period".
This seems to me to be a far more intuitive description of time than "anomaly period" or "change period".
Thinking about how we make a distinction between the time period of the dataset (e.g. 30 year climate periods) and the time period of the variation of the variable relative to the background state.
The documentation for the snow indicators uses the term "time horizon" for the longer term time periods.
Time Horizon:
Recent past (1986-2005)
Near Future (2021-2040)
Mid Century (2041 – 2060)
End of Century (2081- 2100)
If we adopt the same wording we can then refer to the time period of the monthly/season/annual variable as a "time period".
This seems to me to be a far more intuitive description of time than "anomaly period" or "change period".
This is related to issue #42
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: