You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since we will be using ABCI++ soon, it should be much easier to implement a message inclusion check that can be performed when a validator processes a proposal block. This issue has been described in more depth previously in celestiaorg/celestia-core#520 and #1006. We also have a pending ADR celestiaorg/celestia-core#559
This check should ensure that
each valid PayForMessage has a corresponding message with the correct commitment
that there are no unaccounted for messages included in the square
blocked by #381 (might be able to be done in the same PR since they are so related)
Since we will be using ABCI++ soon, it should be much easier to implement a message inclusion check that can be performed when a validator processes a proposal block. This issue has been described in more depth previously in celestiaorg/celestia-core#520 and #1006. We also have a pending ADR celestiaorg/celestia-core#559
This check should ensure that
blocked by #381 (might be able to be done in the same PR since they are so related)
blocked by celestiaorg/celestia-core#204
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: