Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some thing wrong, when route my rover fc to mavlink-udp-proxy #3

Closed
lida2003 opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Some thing wrong, when route my rover fc to mavlink-udp-proxy #3

lida2003 opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@lida2003
Copy link

lida2003 commented Sep 6, 2024

Hi

I have use a rover for testing. to test if it's OK to get data from FC.

  1. On QGC, it's "Ready To Fly" Mode: "Hold"
  2. I run the udp-proxy and get following message
[ INFO] [1725580434.234836624]: found MAV 1
[ INFO] [1725580434.278737811]: time offset 1725537258593911
[ INFO] [1725580434.278893269]: fc: EKF3 refusing set origin
[ INFO] [1725580434.278960310]: fc: No ap_message for mavlink id (105)

What might be wrong, any suggestions?

Or should I get postion from VINS-Mono thought IPC then i will be OK for setting origin?

@chobitsfan
Copy link
Owner

chobitsfan commented Sep 7, 2024

fc: No ap_message for mavlink id (105)

I think HIGHRES_IMU is added recently (see ArduPilot/ardupilot#27007)
Maybe you need to update your ardupilot version?
P.S: I am not sure if HIGHRES_IMU is supported in rover

@lida2003
Copy link
Author

lida2003 commented Sep 8, 2024

need to update your ardupilot version?

Yes, this PR is not merged to any of stable release yet.

4.6.0-dev works:
[ INFO] [1725763776.605588211]: found MAV 1
[ INFO] [1725763776.631456626]: time offset 1725722629593665
[ INFO] [1725763776.638772870]: fc: EKF3 IMU0 origin set
[ INFO] [1725763776.638847784]: fc: EKF3 IMU1 origin set
[ INFO] [1725763776.648151054]: fc: Field Elevation Set: 100m

But I still have question here for those two IPCs, #2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants